COMP14021403_341900629
上传者:刘如九|上传时间:2015-04-21|密次下载
COMP14021403_341900629
关于图像去噪的外文文献
REGION CLASSIFICATION BASED IMAGE
DENOISING USING SHEARLET AND
WAVELET TRANSFORMS
Preety D. Swami1, Alok Jain2 and Dhirendra K. Swami3
1Department of Electronics & Instrumentation Engineering,
SATI, Vidisha, India
preetydswami@http://wendang.chazidian.com 2Department of Electronics & Instrumentation Engineering,
SATI, Vidisha, India
alokjain6@http://wendang.chazidian.com
dhirendrakswami@http://wendang.chazidian.com 3Department of Computer Science and Engineering, VNSIT, Bhopal, India
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a neural network based region classification technique that classifies regions in an image into two classes: textures and homogenous regions. The classification is based on training a neural network with statistical parameters belonging to the regions of interest. An application of this classification method is applied in image denoising by applying different transforms to the two different classes. Texture is denoised by shearlets while homogenous regions are denoised by wavelets. The denoised results show better performance than either of the transforms applied independently. The proposed algorithm successfully reduces the mean square error of the denoised result and provides perceptually good results.
KEYWORDS
Classification, Image denoising, Neural Network, Shearlets, Wavelets
1. INTRODUCTION
Extraction of texture regions in an image is required for interpretation of data and is a challenging job. Mostly, the methods that are employed to characterize textures are statistical in nature. Some other methods that extract texture features are those that use Gabor filtering, fractal dimensions, and wavelet transform [1]. The importance of texture detection is important with the perspective of image enhancement, image segmentation and content classification [2]. In this work a classification scheme is proposed that classifies regions in an image into homogenous regions and textures. The effectiveness of this scheme is proved by applying different transformations to the two classified areas in the image. Thus, this algorithm can be used to denoise images using a hybrid of transforms which gives better results than when denoising is done using a single transform.
The wavelet transform has proved to be a powerful tool for image denoising in the past two decades. The pioneering work of Donoho et al. [3] for image denoising paved the way for many David C. Wyld et al. (Eds) : CST, ITCS, JSE, SIP, ARIA, DMS - 2014
pp. 241–248, 2014. © CS & IT-CSCP 2014 DOI : 10.5121/csit.2014.4122
Beihua University (202.98.20.247) - 2015/4/11 Download
关于图像去噪的外文文献
242 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
researchers to further exploit the multiresolution transforms for denoising purpose. The traditional wavelet transform, although, is good at denoising point singularities in signals, fails at the line singularities such as edges and at textures present in an image. This has led to the need of developing new transforms that may overcome the limitations posed by wavelets. The flowering of many multiresolution transforms, such as, brushlets [4], wedgelets [5], ridgelets [6], curvelets
[7], bandelets [8], contourlets [9], waveatoms [10], shearlets [11] and ripplets [12] has provided a handful of options for image denoising. However, the selection of a particular transform is a bit difficult, as, each of these transforms perform sparsely in specific areas of an image. A transform providing sparse representation in smooth areas may not provide sparsity at the edges or textures and vice versa.
Researchers are continuously in search of methods and transforms that can denoise the variations in an image with perfect reconstruction. For the past few years, denoising techniques, based on combination of multiple transforms have evolved. In [13], Ma et al. proposed a denoising algorithm to perform pixel fusion to result images of curvelets and wavelets approaches. The noisy image is denoised using curvelets as well as using HMT based wavelets. Then image regions are analysed with quadtree decomposition. Weighted pixel fusion method is employed to obtain the final result image.
The discrete curvelet transform can code image edges more efficiently than the wavelet transform
[14-16]. On the other hand, wavelet transform, codes homogenous areas better than curvelet transform. In [14] two combinations of time invariant wavelet and curvelet transforms are used for denoising of SAR images. Both methods use the wavelet transform to denoise homogeneous areas and the curvelet transform to denoise areas with edges. The segmentation between homogeneous areas and areas with edges is done by using total variation segmentation. In [16] the areas containing edges are denoised using spatially adaptive context modelling of curvelet transform coefficients, while the remaining homogenous regions are recovered through spatially adaptive context modelling of wavelet transform coefficients. The areas containing edges and those that do not contain edges are segmented in the space domain by calculating a variance image and then thresholding it. In [17], three combinations of undecimated wavelet and nonsubsampled contourlet transforms are used for denoising of SAR images. Two methods use the wavelet transform to denoise homogeneous areas and the nonsubsampled contourlet transform to denoise areas with edges. The segmentation between homogeneous areas and areas with edges is done by using total variation segmentation. The third method is a linear averaging of the two denoising methods. A thresholding in the wavelet and contourlet domain is done by non-linear functions which are adapted for each selected subband.
Authors in [18] combine wavelet transform with both the ridgelet and the curvelet transform. The residual image gives the information about the efficiency of the method as no features are seen in it. In [19] BayesShrink wavelet is combined with BayesShrink ridgelet denoising method which performs better than each method individually. The proposed combined denoising method gains the advantage of each filter in its specific domain, i.e., wavelet for natural and ridgelet for straight regions, and produces better and smoother results, both visually and in terms of SNR.
The work in [20] utilizes features of wavelet and curvelet transform, separately and adaptively, in different regions of an image, which are identified by variance approach. The homogenous regions are denoised by wavelets and edgy information is obtained with curvelet transform. The spatially adaptive fusion technique fuses the denoised information obtained from the two transforms.
Authors in [21] proposed a multiscale and multidirectional image representation method named CBlet transform. It combines the contourlet transform with the bandeletization procedure. The contourlet transform captures image discontinuous points and links them into linear structures.
Beihua University (202.98.20.247) - 2015/4/11 Download
关于图像去噪的外文文献
Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 243
These linear structures are analysed adaptively by the bandeletization procedure and removes their correlation. The results of the fusion of denoised data from brushlet and wavelet thresholding methods are presented in [22]. Texture-based brushlet denoising is well suited for enhancement of physiological information while wavelet-based denoising is better suited for enhancement of anatomical contours. A three-dimensional multiscale edge-based data fusion algorithm is applied to combine enhanced data from these two independent denoising methods. In
[23] a method is proposed for denoising in which firstly, the DTCWT is employed to obtain subbands, and then bandeletization is implemented in each subband. At last, Bayes soft-threshold shrinkage denoising in bandelet transform domain is implemented. Image with highly directional can be efficiently denoised by this method.
Wavelets and compactly supported shearlets sparsely represent point and curvilinear singularities, respectively. [24] presents an image separation method for separating images into point and curvelike parts by employing a combined dictionary consisting of wavelets and shearlets. In this, it is assumed that noise cannot be represented sparsely by either one of the two representation systems. Thus, noise can be captured in the residual.
In one of our previous works [25], an image denoising method which adaptively combines the features of wavelets, wave atoms and curvelets was proposed. It employs wavelet shrinkage to denoise the smooth regions in the image while wave atoms are employed to denoise the textures and the edges take advantage of curvelet denoising.
This paper proposes a classification technique for segmenting an image into two categories: homogenous regions and texture. The proposed classification algorithm is based on training a neural network using samples from images and some statistical measures pertaining to the two above mentioned categories present in a natural image. The neural network classifier accurately assigns the classes to the different regions. Once the classification is done the results can be used to denoise a noisy image. This work employs a combination of wavelets and shearlets for the purpose of denoising.
The organization of the paper is as follows. Section 2 deals with the proposed region classification algorithm using neural network, along with, an application of the algorithm for image denoising. Experimental results are analysed in Section 3. Finally conclusion is given in Section 4.
2. PROPOSED METHOD
In image denoising, identification of smooth, texture and other regions is a frequent requirement. Various methods have been proposed in the literature for separating smooth, texture and other regions present in the image. Texture is different from smooth areas in that they have some randomness in location, size and orientation of the texture elements [2]. Several texture descriptors are available for identifying textures. These include Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), contrast, directionality, placement rules, Markov Random Field models, and filtering in the transform domain [1]. This task of classification can also be attained by machine learning in a supervised manner. In this section an attempt has been made to use neural network for texture and smooth region identification.
In this proposed classification method, training of a neural network is required which classifies an incoming data (image block) to either smooth class or texture class. For this task, the neural network is trained on some blocks of texture patches and some blocks of smooth region patches. These patches can be extracted from the image of Barbara as shown in Figure 1. In this figure, the region inside the red rectangles, are used to train the texture class and the areas inside the blue
Beihua University (202.98.20.247) - 2015/4/11 Download
关于图像去噪的外文文献
urately assigns the classes to the different regions. Once the classification is done the results can be used to denoise a noisy image. This work employs a combination of wavelets and shearlets for the purpose of denoising. The organization of the paper is as follows. Section 2 deals with the proposed region classification algorithm using neural network, along with, an application of the algorithm for image denoising. Experimental results are analysed in Section 3. Finally conclusion is given in Section 4. 2. PROPOSED METHOD In image denoising, identification of smooth, texture and other regions is a frequent requirement. Various methods have been proposed in the literature for separating smooth, texture and other regions present in the image. Texture is different from smooth areas in that they have some randomness in location, size and orientation of the texture elements [2]. Several texture descriptors are available for identifying textures. These include Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), contrast, directionality, placement rules, Markov Random Field models, and filtering in the transform domain [1]. This task of classification can also be attained by machine learning in a supervised manner. In this section an attempt has been made to use neural network for texture and smooth region identification. In this proposed classification method, training of a neural network is required which classifies an incoming data (image block) to either smooth class or texture class. For this task, the neural network is trained on some blocks of texture patches and some blocks of smooth region patches. These patches can be extracted from the image of Barbara as shown in Figure 1. In this figure, the region inside the red rectangles, are used to train the texture class and the areas inside the blue Beihua University (202.98.20.247) - 2015/4/11 Download 244 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) squares are used to provide training of smooth regions. Each patch is divided into blocks of size 9×9, and these 81 pixel intensity samples are provided as inputs to the neural network. Along with the 81 pixel intensity values of an image block (texture or smooth), three texture descriptors are also used to train the neural network. These descriptors are variance, contrast and connected component count. Each descriptor is calculated for a window size of 9×9. Figure 1. Sample extraction for neural network training. Pixels inside the red rectangle train the texture class and pixels inside the blue square train the class corresponding to smooth regions. The variance inside a window is calculated as the square of the standard deviation. For the calculation of connected components the pixels inside the 9×9 window are divided into two groups. For this the average grey level is computed and the pixel intensity greater than the average are assigned to the first group and the remaining pixels belong to the second group. A binary image of the 9×9 block
关于图像去噪的外文文献
Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 245
3. EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
Feed Forward neural network is commonly used for classification task using back propagation algorithm. In our experiments, a feed forward neural network has been trained to identify a small image window for its smooth or textured nature. For this purpose experiments have been conducted on the popularly used image of Barbara. A set of 9×9 pixel subsets of Barbara have been taken and have been labelled as smooth or texture by human observation. Sufficiently large set of such training samples have been set up to achieve supervised classification using
内容需要下载文档才能查看
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 2. Texture descriptors for Barbara (a) Contrast, (b) Component Count and (c) Variance.
neural network. In addition to the image intensity pixel values of training data’s 9×9 image window subsets, features like variance, contrast and connected component count have also been extracted for training data sample to increase distinguishing ability of different regions. Algorithms employed for extraction of texture descriptors used in this work are explained in detail in [2].
Topology of the network used is explained below:
? Intensity of the image pixel values and the texture descriptors features of the training sample (9×9 block) form the input vector to the neural network. For these training
samples the target output is known in the form of ‘0’ for smooth regions and as ‘1’ for texture regions.
? Number of layers = 2
Number of neurons in the input layer = 84. Out of these, 81 neurons correspond to the normalized pixel intensity values of the 9×9 window. Remaining 3 neurons correspond to the three texture descriptor features: variance, contrast and connected component count.
? Output layer contains 1 node that outputs a ‘0’ for the class smooth regions or a ‘1’ for the class texture regions.
? Hidden layer nodes = 6.
This experiment quite satisfactorily trained the various 9×9 sub images of Barbara. This was tested by simulating the neural network on the training data, which gave the same desired output. Experiments were conducted in Matlab 7.0. The transfer function of all neurons was chosen as 'tansig'. The backpropagation network training function chosen was 'trainlm' and the backpropagation weight/bias learning function used was 'learngdm'. Testing was done by varying the number of hidden layer nodes from 3 to 60. Best results were obtained while taking 6 neurons in the hidden layer. In this training network, with 6 nodes in the hidden layer, the mean squared error (MSE) was of the order of 10-9
内容需要下载文档才能查看.
内容需要下载文档才能查看
Beihua University (202.98.20.247) - 2015/4/11 Download
下载文档
热门试卷
- 2016年四川省内江市中考化学试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 山东省滨州市三校2017届第一学期阶段测试初三英语试题
- 四川省成都七中2017届高三一诊模拟考试文科综合试卷
- 2017届普通高等学校招生全国统一考试模拟试题(附答案)
- 重庆市永川中学高2017级上期12月月考语文试题
- 江西宜春三中2017届高三第一学期第二次月考文科综合试题
- 内蒙古赤峰二中2017届高三上学期第三次月考英语试题
- 2017年六年级(上)数学期末考试卷
- 2017人教版小学英语三年级上期末笔试题
- 江苏省常州西藏民族中学2016-2017学年九年级思想品德第一学期第二次阶段测试试卷
- 重庆市九龙坡区七校2016-2017学年上期八年级素质测查(二)语文学科试题卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016年12月八年级语文阶段性测试卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016-2017学年七年级英语12月阶段检测试卷
- 山东省邹城市第八中学2016-2017学年八年级12月物理第4章试题(无答案)
- 【人教版】河北省2015-2016学年度九年级上期末语文试题卷(附答案)
- 四川省简阳市阳安中学2016年12月高二月考英语试卷
- 四川省成都龙泉中学高三上学期2016年12月月考试题文科综合能力测试
- 安徽省滁州中学2016—2017学年度第一学期12月月考高三英语试卷
- 山东省武城县第二中学2016.12高一年级上学期第二次月考历史试题(必修一第四、五单元)
- 福建省四地六校联考2016-2017学年上学期第三次月考高三化学试卷
- 甘肃省武威第二十三中学2016—2017学年度八年级第一学期12月月考生物试卷
网友关注
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:我国的城镇化发展带来哪些有益
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题06
- 2019吉林公务员考试面试热点模拟题:人才争夺战,你怎么看?
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:打破封闭式小区的门,实行街区制
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:谈谈对“立鸿鹄志,做奋斗者”的理解
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测每日一练言语理解练习题答案08.09
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题04
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题05
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题07
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测常识判断模拟题0906
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:单独两孩
- 2019吉林公务员考试面试热点模拟题:大学生卖煎饼月入13万
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:我国的廉政建设
- 2019吉林公务员考试面试题库:面试每日一练结构化面试模拟题答案9.4
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测判断推理模拟题13
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测数量关系模拟题0913
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测常识判断模拟题0918
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测常识判断模拟题
- 2018年吉林公务员考试结构化面试试题(6月15日)
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题02
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测常识判断模拟题0925
- 2019吉林公务员考试面试模拟题:男子公交车上殴打小孩
- 2019吉林公务考试行测题库:行测每日一练言语理解练习题答案08.29
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测判断推理模拟题06
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测每日一练言语理解练习题08.09
- 2018年吉林公务员考试结构化面试试题解析(6月15日)
- 2019吉林公务员考试申论模拟题:格桑德吉—墨脱的护梦人
- 2019吉林公务考试行测题库:行测每日一练言语理解练习题08.29
- 2019吉林公务员考试行测题库:行测资料分析模拟题03
- 【申论题库】2019吉林公务员考试申论每周一练:全民健身
网友关注视频
- 苏科版八年级数学下册7.2《统计图的选用》
- 外研版英语七年级下册module3 unit2第二课时
- 二年级下册数学第一课
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《租船问题》
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 8
- 沪教版八年级下册数学练习册一次函数复习题B组(P11)
- 七年级英语下册 上海牛津版 Unit5
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 苏教版二年级下册数学《认识东、南、西、北》
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《有余数除法的简单应用》
- 外研版英语三起5年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit1
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用)五年级下册 Unit 1
- 二年级下册数学第二课
- 第12章 圆锥曲线_12.7 抛物线的标准方程_第一课时(特等奖)(沪教版高二下册)_T274713
- 二次函数求实际问题中的最值_第一课时(特等奖)(冀教版九年级下册)_T144339
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 五年级下册 Unit 10
- 冀教版英语四年级下册第二课
- 冀教版英语五年级下册第二课课程解读
- 第五单元 民族艺术的瑰宝_16. 形形色色的民族乐器_第一课时(岭南版六年级上册)_T1406126
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,天津市
- 化学九年级下册全册同步 人教版 第25集 生活中常见的盐(二)
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《余数和除数的关系》
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二周第2课时《我们的测量》宝丰街小学庞志荣
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 六年级下册 Unit 7
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 12
- 19 爱护鸟类_第一课时(二等奖)(桂美版二年级下册)_T502436
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 3
- 苏科版数学 八年级下册 第八章第二节 可能性的大小
- 青岛版教材五年级下册第四单元(走进军营——方向与位置)用数对确定位置(一等奖)
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,广东省
精品推荐
- 2016-2017学年高一语文人教版必修一+模块学业水平检测试题(含答案)
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
分类导航
- 互联网
- 电脑基础知识
- 计算机软件及应用
- 计算机硬件及网络
- 计算机应用/办公自动化
- .NET
- 数据结构与算法
- Java
- SEO
- C/C++资料
- linux/Unix相关
- 手机开发
- UML理论/建模
- 并行计算/云计算
- 嵌入式开发
- windows相关
- 软件工程
- 管理信息系统
- 开发文档
- 图形图像
- 网络与通信
- 网络信息安全
- 电子支付
- Labview
- matlab
- 网络资源
- Python
- Delphi/Perl
- 评测
- Flash/Flex
- CSS/Script
- 计算机原理
- PHP资料
- 数据挖掘与模式识别
- Web服务
- 数据库
- Visual Basic
- 电子商务
- 服务器
- 搜索引擎优化
- 存储
- 架构
- 行业软件
- 人工智能
- 计算机辅助设计
- 多媒体
- 软件测试
- 计算机硬件与维护
- 网站策划/UE
- 网页设计/UI
- 网吧管理