Effects of personal nostalgic response intensity on cognitions, attitudes, and intentions
上传者:韩启纲|上传时间:2015-04-28|密次下载
Effects of personal nostalgic response intensity on cognitions, attitudes, and intentions
Thecurrentissueandfulltextarchiveofthisjournalisavailableat
http://wendang.chazidian.com/2040-7122.htm
Effectsofpersonalnostalgicresponseintensityoncognitions,attitudes,andintentions
ChristopherMarchegianiandIanPhau
CurtinUniversityofTechnology,Perth,Australia
Abstract
Purpose–Thepaperaimstoexaminetheeffectofvaryingintensitiesofpersonalnostalgiaoncognition,attitudes,andpurchaseintention.
Design/methodology/approach–Datawerecollectedusingconveniencesamplingviaaself-administeredquestionnaireinalargeAustralianuniversity.Respondentswereexposedtonostalgiccueladenadvertisingstimulus.Atotalof514responseswereanalysed.Thequestionnaireincludesathoughtcollectionexerciseandscalestomeasurepersonalnostalgia,attitudes,andintention.Analysisofvarianceandmultivariateanalysisofvariancewereusedtoanalysethedata.Findings–Anumberofcognitivereactionsaresigni?cantlyaffectedwhenmovingfromalowtomoderateorhighlevelofpersonalnostalgia.However,nosigni?cantbene?tinthecognitiveresponsestestedisachievedbymovingfrommoderatetohighlevels.Incontrast,attitudesandintentionsimprovesigni?cantlywitheachincreaseofpersonalnostalgia.
Researchlimitations/implications–http://wendang.chazidian.comparisonsofresponsesundertypesofnostalgicreactionsarealsoneeded.
Practicalimplications–Thepaperprovidespractitionerswithavastlyimprovedunderstandingofconsumerresponseswhenvaryinglevelsofpersonalnostalgiaareexperienced.Practitionersshouldnotethesigni?cantchangeinadvert-executionrelatedthoughtsbetweenintensitylevelscouldbebene?cialorharmful,dependingonthedesiredresponse.Theresearchindicatesitisworthwhiletoencouragehighlevelsofpersonalnostalgiaincomparisontosettlingforalowormoderatelevelasalthoughcognitiveresponsesdonotsigni?cantlychange,attitudesandintentiontopurchasesigni?cantlyimprove.
Originality/value–Thevastmajorityofpreviousstudiesfocusonnostalgiaasauni?edconcept.Althoughpersonalnostalgiaisdistinctfromothernostalgicreactions,noempiricalresearchexamineshowconsumerreactionsareaffectedbyvaryinglevelsofthisspeci?cnostalgicresponse.KeywordsNostalgia,Cognition,Attitudes,Consumerbehaviour,Buyingbehaviour
PapertypeResearchpaperEffectsofresponseintensity241ReceivedJuly2009RevisedOctober2009,January2010AcceptedJanuary2010
Introduction
Marketingliteraturedescribesnostalgiaas:
[...]apreference(generalliking,positiveattitude,orfavourableaffect)towardobjects(people,places,orthings)thatweremorecommon(popular,fashionable,orwidelycirculated)whenonewasyounger(inearlyadulthood,inadolescence,inchildhood,orevenbeforebirth)(HolbrookandSchindler,1991,p.330).
Nostalgiaisshowntosigni?cantlyin?uencearangeofconsumerreactionsimportanttomarketingandadvertisingincludingself-concept,brandloyalty,brandmeaning,thehumansenses,attitudeformation,cognitionandmemoryprocesses,consumptionpreferences,literarycriticism,collectivememory,andemotions(MuehlingandSprott,2004;
内容需要下载文档才能查看JournalofResearchinInteractiveMarketingVol.4No.3,2010pp.241-256qEmeraldGroupPublishingLimited2040-7122
DOI10.1108/17505931011070596
JRIM4,3242NaughtonandVlasic,1998).Nostalgiaalsoaffectspeopleregardlessoftheirage,gender,socialclass,ethnicity,orothersocialgroupings(Greenbergetal.,2004).Animportantdistinctionismadebetweentwodistinctformsofnostalgia:namely“personal”and“historical”nostalgia(Stern,1992;MarchegianiandPhau,2010).Personalnostalgiadealswithautobiographicalmemoryorself-referencing/personalconnections(Brewer,1986;ConwayandFthenaki,2000;ConwayandPleydell-Pearce,
2000;Neisser,1988;Rubin,1986;Sheenetal.,2001;Tulving,1972,1984),andisdiscussedasnostalgiathatrelatesto“thewayIwas”(Stern,1992).Historicalnostalgiadealsinsteadwithcollectivememoryandcanbegeneratedfromatimetherespondentdidnotexperiencedirectly,evenatimebeforetheywereborn(Halbwachs,1950,1992;Pennebakeretal.,1997;Zelizer,2008).Historicalnostalgiaisdiscussedas“thewayitwas”(Stern,1992).Althoughthecognitiveresponsesdiscussedandotherrelatedconsumerreactionsareexpectedtodiffersigni?cantlyasaresultofthetypeofnostalgiaexperienced,thereisasigni?cantde?ciencyofempiricalresearchintothesetwospeci?cnostalgicreactions.Thisde?ciencyincludescomparisonbetweenthenostalgicreactiontypesandexploringchangeswithinthespeci?cnostalgicresponses.Thispaperbeginstoclosethisgapbyexploringspeci?callypersonalnostalgiaandanalysingnumberofhypothesesrelatedtosomeofthemostimportantconsumerreactions;namelycognition,attitudes,andpurchaseintentions.Thesereactionsareexaminedamongrespondentsexperiencinglowpersonalnostalgia(LPN),moderatepersonalnostalgia(MPN),orhighpersonalnostalgia(HPN)reactionstoadvertising.Resultsshowanumberofcognitiveresponsesaresigni?cantlyaffectedwhenmovingfromalowtomoderateorhighlevelofpersonalnostalgia.However,nosigni?cantbene?tinthecognitiveresponsestestedisachievedbymovingfrommoderatetohighlevels.Incontrast,attitudesandintentionsimprovesigni?cantlyateachincreaseofpersonalnostalgia.Nopriorstudiesempiricallyexaminetheseconsumerresponsesinrespondentsexperiencingvaryinglevelsofpersonalnostalgia.Asmarketerscommonlyusepersonalnostalgicappealsinthemarketplacebyencouragingconsumerstothinkbacktopastexperiencesbothrelatedandunrelatedtotheproductbeingsold,itisimportanttounderstandthechangesincognitive,attitudinal,andpurchaseintentreactionswhenavaryinglevelofpersonalnostalgiaisexperienced.Thispaperbeginswithadiscussiononextantliteratureandtheoreticalunderpinningsleadingtothehypothesesdevelopment.Adescriptionoftheresearchmethodanddiscussionoftheanalysisand?ndingsispresentednext.Finally,themanagerialimplicationsandlimitationsofthestudyarehighlighted.
Theoryandhypothesesdevelopment
Cognition
Cognitionisshowntobein?uencedbynostalgiainanumberofstudies(BakerandKennedy,1994;Belk,1991;Davis,1979;HolakandHavlena,1998;HolbrookandSchindler,1991;MuehlingandSprott,2004).Althoughpreviousstudiesexplorecognitivereactionswithnostalgiccomparedtonon-nostalgicappeals,noempiricalresearchoncognitionasaresultoftheintensityofaspeci?cnostalgicreactionhasbeenundertaken.Asdiscussed,thefocusofthisstudyisonchangesinpersonalnostalgia.Extantliteratureonmemoryaccessibility?ndssalientthoughtsaremoreeasilyretrievedandproducedingreaterquantitythanlesssalientthoughts(Bettman,1979;CraikandLockhart,1972;Wright,1980).Researchinthisareaalsoshowssalientthoughts
areoftenself-referencingthoughtsorpersonalconnections(Krugman,1967)andcanin?uencemental-processingactivitywhenattitudesareformedorretrieved(Greenwald,1968).Anincreaseinpersonalrelevancecanalsoalterthelevelofinvolvementinrespondents(Pettyetal.,1983).Assuch,ariseinthelevelofpersonalnostalgic,whichbyde?nitionwouldbedrawnfroma?lteredversionofautobiographicalmemory(Belk,1990;Davis,1979;Stern,1992)duetotheconnectionorassociationwithanindividual’srealoridealizedpast(Belk,1990;HolakandHavlena,1992),shouldresultinagreaternumberofthoughts.Thus,H1apostulatesthatasthelevelofpersonalnostalgiaincreasesinrespondentsthereisasigni?cantincreaseinthenumberofthoughts.Intermsofthecontentofthethoughtsexperienced,H1bpostulatesanincreaseinthenumberofpersonalnostalgia-relatedthoughtsasthelevelofpersonalnostalgiarises.Furthermore,asthesenostalgicthoughtsareexpectedtobegenerallywarmandpositiveinnature(HolakandHavlena,1998;Johnson-LairdandOatley,1989)thereisanexpectationthatrespondentswillbemotivatedtogenerateadditionalthoughtsofthisnatureasopposedtothoughtsthatdonotprovidethisbene?t.Assuch,theratioofpersonalnostalgicthoughtstototalthoughtsisproposedtoincreaseasthelevelofpersonalnostalgiarises(H1c).Basedontheprecedingdiscussion,asummaryofthecognition-relatedhypothesestothispointarepresented:
H1.Asthelevelofpersonalnostalgiaincreasesthereis:
H1a.Asigni?cantincreaseinthenumberofthoughtsoverall.
H1b.Asigni?cantincreaseinthenumberofpersonalnostalgia-relatedthoughts.H1c.Asigni?cantincreaseintheratioofpersonalnostalgic-relatedthoughtsto
totalthoughts.
Thisresearchisbasedonthepropositionthatpersonalandhistoricalnostalgiaaredistinctlydifferentfromoneanother.Whilethisdoesnotsuggesttheyareexclusiveresponses(i.e.respondentsmayfeelelementsofbothtypesifthemessagecuesindicateelicitasmuch)thedistinctionalsomeansthereisnosuggestionthatariseinpersonalnostalgiashouldleadtoahighernumberofspeci?callyhistoricalnostalgia-relatedthoughts.Assuch,itispostulatedthat:
H1d.Nosigni?cantchangeinthenumberofhistoricalnostalgic-relatedthoughts.Sujanetal.(1993)andWilliamsandFaber(1999)cautionencouragingtheretrievalofautobiographicalmemoriesastheycanactasadistractionleadingtorespondentsevokingfewerthoughtsabouttheadvertisedproduct’sfeaturesthanadvertisementsnotencouragingsuchformofmemoryretrieval.Thus,advertisersmayinadvertentlycausebrand/messagerelatedthoughtstobelessaccessible.MuehlingandSprott(2004)empiricallytestedthenumberofbrand/message-related(product)thoughtsgeneratedduringexposuretoanostalgicandnon-nostalgicadvertandfoundnosigni?cantdifferencebetweentreatmentgroups.Althoughthisisregardingsimplythenumberofbrand/message-related(product)thoughts,asopposedtothefeaturerecallandbrandevaluationtestedbySujanetal.(1993)whichfoundwhenautobiographicalmemories(selfreferencing,asperpersonalnostalgicthoughts)areencouragedareducedanalysisof,andmemoryfor,productinformationinconsumersresults.Thisstudyproposesthisdistractionfrombrand/message-relatedthoughtswilloccuraspersonalnostalgiaEffectsofresponseintensity243
JRIM4,3increases,andad-execution-relatedthoughtswillalsoexperiencethisdecrease.Assuch
itispostulatedthat:
H1e.Asigni?cantdecreaseinthenumberofbrand/message-relatedthoughts.H1f.Asigni?cantdecreaseinthenumberofad-execution-relatedthoughts.
244Attitudesandintentions
Attitudestowardstheadvert(Aad),Attitudetowardsthebrand(Ab),andintentionstopurchasethebrand(Ib)areshowntosigni?cantlyimprovewhennostalgiaisexperienced(Pascaletal.,2002;MuehlingandSprott,2004).Thisisconsistentwithmodelsofpersuasionwhichshowtheeffectgeneratedatthetimeofad-exposurehavingsigni?cantimpactonconsumerevaluations(MacKenzieetal.,1986;Zajonc,1980).Baumgartneretal.(1992)alsodemonstratethatincreaseretrievalofmostlypositiveautobiographicalmemoriesresultsinamorefavourableattitudetowardstheadvert.Althoughpreviousresponsesareexploredinrelationtonostalgia,asisthecaseinthehypothesisbasedoncognition,empiricalevidenceonthein?uenceoftheintensityofpersonalnostalgiaisde?cient.Thepreviousstudies,combinedwiththetheoriessupportinganincreasedsalienceandpositivenatureofresponsesaspersonalnostalgiamakesautobiographicalconnections,resultsinthefollowinghypothesis:H2.Asthelevelofpersonalnostalgiaincreasesthereisasigni?cantpositive
increasein:
H2a.Attitudetowardstheadvert.
H2b.Attitudetowardsthebrand.
H2c.Intentiontopurchasethebrand
Method
Sample
TherespondentswerecollectedfromastudentpopulationatalargeAustralianuniversity.Toincreasethelevelofhomogeneousnessinthisconveniencesamplerespondentsaredelimitedtothoseaged18-26.Thissamplealsoassistsinensuringin?uencessuchasconsumer’slifestation,agedifferences,pastexperiences,anddifferencesinbrand/productrecognition/familiarityarediminished.Paststudiesexploringnostalgicreactionstoadvertssuccessfullyusestudentsamples(MuehlingandSprott,2004;BakerandKennedy,1994).Additionally,studentsamplesarefoundtoberepresentativeofgeneralconsumers(Yavas,1994).Atotalof514respondents(47.5percentmale,52.5percentfemale)indicatedasexperiencingahigherlevelofpersonalthanhistoricalnostalgiaasmeasuredbythepersonalandhistoricalnostalgiascales(MarchegianiandPhau,2007a,b)areutilized.
Collectionprocedure
Responseswerecollectedinaclassroomstylesettingingroupsofeightto15participants.Afterabrieforientationsessioneachparticipantwasprovidedwithasurveyformtobecompletedafterexposuretonostalgiccueladenbroadcaststyleadvertising.ImmediatelyafterviewingtheconstructedadvertrespondentscompletedathoughtcollectionexercisesimilartoMuehlingandSprott’s(2004)intheirstudyofnostalgia.Thisexercisemade
nomentionwhatsoeverofnostalgiaornostalgia-relatednotions.Respondentsweregiventhreeminutestocompletethistask(Gurhan-CanliandMaheswaran,1998).Theinstrumentsmeasuringattitudestowardtheadvert,attitudestowardthebrand,andintentiontopurchasethebrandwerecompletednext.Themanipulationcheckinstrumentstomeasurethelevelofpersonalandhistoricalnostalgiaarecompletedafterthedependentmeasurestoreducethelikelihoodofanypotentialcontaminatingeffect.Finally,demographicquestionswerecompleted.Eachinstrumentisdiscussedindetailsubsequently.
Stimulus
Thenostalgiccuesaredrawnfromthelargebodyofliteraturewhichsuggestsvariouspromptsforelicitingnostalgia(Allenetal.,1995;Arenietal.,1998;Goulding,2001;Greenbergetal.,2004;HavlenaandHolak,1991;Hirsch,1995;HolakandHavlena,1992;Howell,1991;Lowenthal,1981;Norman,1990;SchindlerandHolbrook,1993;Tannock,1995;Wildschutetal.,2006;Witkowski,1998).Thisincludedstudiesthatsuggestcuespertainingspeci?callytopersonalnostalgia;forexample,Stern(1992)suggestspersonalnostalgiausesfamiliar/real-lifecharactersofteninsentimental/tearfulroles.Thecues,whichoftenreferencedfamilyandspecialoccasions,werepre-testedinfocusgroupdiscussionstoensurethestimuluscouldelicittheintendednostalgicreaction.ThebranddepictedisKodak,whichissuccessfullyusedinpreviousstudiesofnostalgia(MuehlingandSprott,2004)andisconsideredfamiliartothepopulationexamined.Theproductcategoriesassociatedwiththebrandarealsorelevanttopersonalnostalgiccues(e.g.lookingback,remembering)allowingtheappealtobeutilizedinabelievablemanner.
Instruments
Cognitivereactionswerecollectedbyusingathoughtcollectionprocessoccurringimmediatelyafterexposuretotheadvert.Thisconsistsoftherespondentlistingeachthoughttheyhadduringtheadvertonaseparatelinewithinathree-minutetimeframe(asperWright,1980;Gurhan-CanliandMaheswaran,1998;MuehlingandSprott,2004).Wordingoftheinstructionsforthisinstrumentisadaptedfrompreviousstudies(Homer,1990;MacKenzieetal.,1986).TwoindependentjudgeslatercodedthethoughtsintocategoriessimilartothoseofMuehlingandSprott(2004)andSujanetal.(1993).The?vecategoriesarepersonalnostalgia,historicalnostalgia,ad-execution,brand/messagerelated,andmiscellaneous.Disagreementwasresolvedbydiscussionbetweenthetwojudges(Cipollietal.,2001;Gentneretal.,2003;HomerandYoon,1992;JudgeandIlies,2002;MuehlingandSprott,2004).AnalysisofthishypothesisfollowsamethodsimilartoMuehlingandSprott’s(2004)studyofnostalgiainexaminingsimplecountsandratios,exceptthisstudyincludesspeci?callypersonalandhistoricalnostalgiaratherthancombiningthesetwocategories.
Respondentscompletedattitudesandintentionscalescommonlyusedinnostalgicandnon-nostalgicstudiesonadvertising(CoxandCox,1988;Holbrook,1993,1994;HolbrookandSchindler,1994;KrishnamurthyandSujan,1999;Bruneretal.,2001;MuehlingandSprott,2004).Tomeasureattitudetowardstheadvert(Aad)thefouritemsusedaregood/bad,favourable/unfavourable,positive/negative,andpleasant/unpleasant.Attitudetowardsthebrand(Ab)alsoismeasuredbyfouritems:good/bad,like/dislike,favourable/unfavourable,andvaluable/worthless.Finally,intentiontoEffectsofresponseintensity245
下载文档
热门试卷
- 2016年四川省内江市中考化学试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 山东省滨州市三校2017届第一学期阶段测试初三英语试题
- 四川省成都七中2017届高三一诊模拟考试文科综合试卷
- 2017届普通高等学校招生全国统一考试模拟试题(附答案)
- 重庆市永川中学高2017级上期12月月考语文试题
- 江西宜春三中2017届高三第一学期第二次月考文科综合试题
- 内蒙古赤峰二中2017届高三上学期第三次月考英语试题
- 2017年六年级(上)数学期末考试卷
- 2017人教版小学英语三年级上期末笔试题
- 江苏省常州西藏民族中学2016-2017学年九年级思想品德第一学期第二次阶段测试试卷
- 重庆市九龙坡区七校2016-2017学年上期八年级素质测查(二)语文学科试题卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016年12月八年级语文阶段性测试卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016-2017学年七年级英语12月阶段检测试卷
- 山东省邹城市第八中学2016-2017学年八年级12月物理第4章试题(无答案)
- 【人教版】河北省2015-2016学年度九年级上期末语文试题卷(附答案)
- 四川省简阳市阳安中学2016年12月高二月考英语试卷
- 四川省成都龙泉中学高三上学期2016年12月月考试题文科综合能力测试
- 安徽省滁州中学2016—2017学年度第一学期12月月考高三英语试卷
- 山东省武城县第二中学2016.12高一年级上学期第二次月考历史试题(必修一第四、五单元)
- 福建省四地六校联考2016-2017学年上学期第三次月考高三化学试卷
- 甘肃省武威第二十三中学2016—2017学年度八年级第一学期12月月考生物试卷
网友关注
- 2013年暑假高一物理衔接班辅导资料
- 新疆维吾尔自治区民族团结进步工作条例Word
- Hydraulic-system液压系统大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文
- 毕业设计 送料机械手_设计说明书
- 《少年闰土》王砚玲Word
- 2017-2020年光热发电行业项目市场研究分析报告
- 错过清明
- 咸安店促销活动方案Word
- 宝马Word
- 红色大气精美五四青年正能量共青团团委Word
- 中班语言:听(诗歌)
- 银行考试招聘会计知识点题库四答案
- 男性补充蛋白锌硒的好处
- 王维山居秋暝Word
- 二次根式
- 大型股份公司全套作业流程图答案Word
- 爱伦斯特克拉美钻专营店网络推广方案-二次修改21pWord
- 统计学第3阶段测试题和答案
- 应用文写作 第二章 应用文写作基础知识Word
- 环境法-定稿
- 松树镇科畦教学点网格化监管体系示意图
- 短歌行.曹操Word
- 2015年成都双流东升项目定位初探Word
- 第16讲(竞赛选讲)因式分解之添项拆项,双十字相乘
- 最新智慧城市解决方案Word
- 品冠Word
- IGCC能源计划中的精馏塔的气态分离的动力模型毕业论文外文文献翻译
- 民间借贷法律讲座Word
- 家长会Word
- 新人教版七年级下数学5.3.1平行线的性质Word
网友关注视频
- 外研版英语七年级下册module1unit3名词性物主代词讲解
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《老山界》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 北师大版小学数学四年级下册第15课小数乘小数一
- 二年级下册数学第二课
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二周第2课时《我们的测量》宝丰街小学庞志荣
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 五年级下册 Unit 12
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,辽宁省
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,广东省
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《有余数除法的竖式计算》
- 六年级英语下册上海牛津版教材讲解 U1单词
- 冀教版小学英语五年级下册lesson2教学视频(2)
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 第五单元 民族艺术的瑰宝_16. 形形色色的民族乐器_第一课时(岭南版六年级上册)_T3751175
- 化学九年级下册全册同步 人教版 第22集 酸和碱的中和反应(一)
- 外研版英语三起5年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit2
- 冀教版英语五年级下册第二课课程解读
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《余数和除数的关系》
- 第五单元 民族艺术的瑰宝_15. 多姿多彩的民族服饰_第二课时(市一等奖)(岭南版六年级上册)_T129830
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 12
- 第19课 我喜欢的鸟_第一课时(二等奖)(人美杨永善版二年级下册)_T644386
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册1
- 8 随形想象_第一课时(二等奖)(沪教版二年级上册)_T3786594
- 沪教版八年级下册数学练习册一次函数复习题B组(P11)
- 苏科版八年级数学下册7.2《统计图的选用》
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 2
- 七年级英语下册 上海牛津版 Unit5
- 外研版英语七年级下册module3 unit2第二课时
- 人教版二年级下册数学
- 沪教版八年级下册数学练习册20.4(2)一次函数的应用2P8
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 五年级下册 Unit 7
精品推荐
- 2016-2017学年高一语文人教版必修一+模块学业水平检测试题(含答案)
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
分类导航
- 互联网
- 电脑基础知识
- 计算机软件及应用
- 计算机硬件及网络
- 计算机应用/办公自动化
- .NET
- 数据结构与算法
- Java
- SEO
- C/C++资料
- linux/Unix相关
- 手机开发
- UML理论/建模
- 并行计算/云计算
- 嵌入式开发
- windows相关
- 软件工程
- 管理信息系统
- 开发文档
- 图形图像
- 网络与通信
- 网络信息安全
- 电子支付
- Labview
- matlab
- 网络资源
- Python
- Delphi/Perl
- 评测
- Flash/Flex
- CSS/Script
- 计算机原理
- PHP资料
- 数据挖掘与模式识别
- Web服务
- 数据库
- Visual Basic
- 电子商务
- 服务器
- 搜索引擎优化
- 存储
- 架构
- 行业软件
- 人工智能
- 计算机辅助设计
- 多媒体
- 软件测试
- 计算机硬件与维护
- 网站策划/UE
- 网页设计/UI
- 网吧管理