Carcinogenesis-2011-Dominissini-1569-77
上传者:李宇成|上传时间:2015-04-28|密次下载
Carcinogenesis-2011-Dominissini-1569-77
腺苷和致癌
Carcinogenesisdoi:10.1093/carcin/bgr124vol.32no.11pp.1569–1577,2011
AdvanceAccesspublicationJune29,2011
REVIEW
Adenosine-to-inosineRNAeditingmeetscancerDanDominissini1,2,SharonMoshitch-Moshkovitz1,revealedthatitisawidespreadmodi?cationaffectingmostlyNinetteAmariglio1andGideonRechavi1,2,Ãnon-codingrepetitiveelementsinthousandsofgenes(3–5).1CancerResearchCenter,ChaimShebaMedicalCenter,TelHashomer52621,Israeland2SacklerSchoolofMedicine,TelAvivUniversity,TelAviv69978,ThebasicsofA-to-IRNAeditingIsraelA-to-IRNAeditingistheirreversibledeaminationofadenosinetoÃTowhomcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressed.inosineindouble-strandedRNA(dsRNA),conservedfromseaEmail:gidi.rechavi@sheba.health.gov.ilanemonestoHomosapiens(6).ThereactionismediatedbyafamilyTheroleofepigeneticsintumoronsetandprogressionhasbeenofadenosinedeaminasesactingonRNA(ADARs)andoccursextensivelyaddressed.Discoveriesinthelastdecadecompletelyco-transcriptionallyatleastinsomecases(7–9).ThreemembersofchangedourviewonRNA.WenowrealizethatitsdiversityliestheADARfamilyhavebeenidenti?edinmammals:ADAR1,2and3.atthebaseofbiologicalcomplexity.Adenosine-to-inosineWhileADAR1andADAR2areexpressedinmosttissues,ADAR3is(A-to-I)RNAeditingemergesacentralgeneratoroftranscrip-exclusivelydetectedinthecentralnervoussystem(reviewedintomediversityandregulationinhighereukaryotes.Itistheref.10).posttranscriptionaldeaminationofadenosinetoinosineindou-AllADARsshareahighlyconservedC-terminalcatalyticdeami-ble-strandedRNAcatalyzedbyenzymesoftheadenosinedeam-nasedomainandcontainseveralN-terminaldsRNA-bindingmotifs.inaseactingonRNA(ADAR)family.Thoughtat?rsttobeADAR1hastwomajorisoformstranscribedfromalternativepro-restrictedtocodingregionsofonlyafewgenes,recentbioinfor-moters:ashorter110-kDaisoformlocalizespredominantlytothematicanalysesfueledbyhigh-throughputsequencingrevealednucleusandalongerinterferon-inducible,150-kDaisoformshuttlesthatitisawidespreadmodi?cationaffectingmostlynon-codingbetweenthenucleusandthecytoplasm(11–14).ADAR2alsohasrepetitiveelementsinthousandsofgenes.Theriseinscopeisseveralisoforms,albeitlesswellcharacterizedandlocalizestotheaccompaniedbydiscoveryofagrowingrepertoireoffunctionsnucleus(15–17).ADAR1andADAR2formhomo-aswellashetero-basedondifferentialdecodingofinosinebythevariouscellulardimersinvivo(18,19).Incontrast,ADAR3existsasamonomer,atmachineries:whenrecognizedasguanosine,itcanleadtopro-leastinvitro,whichmayexplainwhyneitheritsenzymaticactivityteinrecoding,alternativesplicingoralteredmicroRNAspeci?c-noritseditingsubstrateshavebeendemonstrated(20).ity;whenrecognizedbyinosine-bindingproteins,itcanresultinThesecondarystructureofanRNAmoleculelargelydeterminesnuclearretentionofthetranscriptoritsdegradation.Animbal-whichadenosinescanbedeaminated,withaminorpreferenceforanceinexpressionofADARenzymeswithconsequenteditingcertain?ankingnucleotides(21–24).WhereaslongdsRNAs(.100dysregulationisacharacteristicofhumancancers.Thesealter-bp)arepromiscuouslyandextensivelyhypereditedwithupto50%ofationsmayberesponsibleforactivatingproto-oncogenesoradenosinesdeaminated,short(orlongbutimperfect)dsRNAsareinactivatingtumorsuppressors.Whileunlikelytobeanearlymoreselectivelyedited,withonlyafewadenosinesmeetingthesec-initiating‘hit’,editingdysregulationseemstocontributetotu-morprogressionandthusshouldbeconsidereda‘drivermuta-ondarystructurecriteria(24–27).Thecurrentmodelholdsthattion’.Inthisreview,weexaminethecontributionofA-to-IRNAdsRNA-bindingmotifsmediateeditingselectivitybyanchoringeditingtocarcinogenesis.ADARtoadsRNAregion,whereasthecatalyticdomainlendsspec-
i?city,thatispreferenceforadenosineswithinaspeci?ccontextofneighboringnucleotides(28,29).Arecentstudyre?nedthismodelandfoundthatthedsRBMsofADAR2alsocontributetoeditingspeci?citybydirectreadoutoftheRNAsequenceintheminorgroove
Introductionofaspeci?ccontext(30).Non-selectivehypereditingresultsin
adifferentsetofinosinesineachmoleculewithinthepopulationof
Epigeneticandpost-transcriptionalmechanismsareimportantforagiventranscript.WhileADAR1ismainlyresponsibleforhyper-normaltissuedevelopmentandgeneexpression.Numerousstudieshavedocumentedglobalepigeneticabnormalitiesincancercells.editing,ADAR2isresponsibleforselectivesite-speci?ceditingTwosuchextensivelydysregulatedmechanismsareDNAmethyl-(24,27).However,somesubstrateoverlapexistsbetweenthetwo(23).ationandcovalenthistonemodi?cations,whichaffecttumor-RNAeditingef?ciency(thefractionofmoleculesinwhichanspeci?cgeneexpressionthroughnucleosomeremodeling(1,2).inosineappearsinsteadofagenomicallyencodedadenosine)andThelargeamountofdataaccumulatedintherecentyearstrans-patternsexhibitdynamicchangesaffectedbyenvironmentalsignalsformedourperceptionofeukaryoticgeneexpressionasitisnowsuchasstressorinternalsignalssuchasmetabolicstateandcellcycleclearthatenormousdiversitycanbegeneratedattheRNAlevel.(31–38).Importantly,noteverymoleculethatcanadopttherequiredRNAmoleculesundergoelaborateprocessingandaresubjectedtostructurewilleventuallyundergoediting.Asaconsequence,differentawiderangeofpost-transcriptionalmodi?cationsthataffecttheirmessengerRNA(mRNA)variantsofthesamegenearegenerated,fate.Theseincludesplicing,5#capping,3#polyadenylationanddramaticallyincreasingthediversityofthetranscriptome(39).RNAediting,tonameafew.ThemostprevalenttypeofRNAInitially,onlyahandfulofselectiveeditingsitesweredocumentededitinginhighereukaryotesistheconversionofadenosinetoin-withincodingregions,resultinginproteinrecodingandaffectingosinebyhydrolyticdeamination(A-to-Iediting).Thoughtat?rsttoproteinpropertiesandinteractions.Inrecentyears,largedatasetsberestrictedtocodingregionsofonlyafewgenes,recentbioin-obtainedthroughhigh-throughputsequencingapproachesintegratedformaticanalysescomplementedbyhigh-throughputsequencingbybioinformaticanalysesdemonstratedasigni?cantlywiderextent
ofA-to-Ieditingaffectingthousandsofgenesintensofthousandsofsites.Theseeditingeventsoccurmostlyinnon-codingrepetitive
Abbreviations:ADAR,adenosinedeaminaseactingonRNA;dsRNA,double-sequences,suchasAlurepeats,andtendtoundergonon-selectivestrandedRNA;HSC,hematopoieticstemcell;LSC,leukemiastemcell;hyperediting(3,4,40,41).mRNA,messengerRNA;siRNA,smallinterferingRNA;UTR,untranslatedInosinesintheRNAmoleculemayservedifferentpurposes,region.dependingontheinvolvedmechanismandinteractingproteins.ÓTheAuthor2011.PublishedbyOxfordUniversityPress.Allrightsreserved.ForPermissions,pleaseemail:journals.permissions@http://wendang.chazidian.com1569Downloaded from http://wendang.chazidian.com/ at Fudan University on November 16, 2014
腺苷和致癌
D.Dominissinietal.
Withincodingsequences,inosinesaredecodedasguanosinesbythetranslationmachinery(asinosinepreferentiallybasepairswithcyti-dine)(42),thusresultinginproteinrecoding.Onewell-studiedexam-pleofediting-dependentproteinrecodingistheglutamatereceptorsubunit,GluR-B.SelectiveADAR2-mediatededitingofGluR-BleadstogenerationofanimpermeableCaþ2-ionchannelduetoaglu-tamine/arginine(Q/R)substitution(43).Thesplicingmachineryalsorecognizesinosinesasguanosines,enablingeditingtogenerateandeliminatedonororacceptorsplicesitesequences.Editing-dependentalterationofsplicesitesintheADAR2transcriptitselfgeneratesanalternative3#-spliceacceptorsite(9)(seedetaileddiscussionofedit-ingandsplicinginthecontextofcancerinasectionbelow).
A-to-Ieditingalsoin?uencessmallinterferingRNA(siRNA)-andmicroRNA-mediatedgenesilencingwhichdependonformationofdsRNAfortheirbiogenesisandaction.InosineswereshowntoaffectallmajorstagesofmicroRNAbiogenesisandfunction:(i)ADAR1andADAR2editspeci?cadenosinesincertainpri-microRNAstherebysuppressingsubsequentprocessingbyDroshaandDicer(44,45),(ii)inosinespresentinmaturemicroRNAsmayalterbindingtotargetsequences(46)oralternatively(iii)editingof3#untranslatedregions(UTRs)harboringmicroRNAbindingsitescanhaveacompa-rableeffectthroughmodulationofbasepairingoraccessibility(47).Thesigni?canceofnon-selectivehypereditingoflongdsRNAsoccurringmostlyinnon-codingregionsoftranscriptsharboringre-petitivesequencesisstilllargelyunclear.Severallinesofevidencesupportaroleinregulationofgeneexpressionthroughshorteningof3#UTRsbynucleasesthatactoninosine-containingRNAssuchasTudor-SN(48,49)oralternativelythroughnuclearretentionbyacom-plexcontainingp54nrbwhichrecognizesinosine-containingRNAs(50,51).Inbothcases,theproteinsmediatingtheoutcomespeci?callyinteractwithinosine,which,unlikewiththetranslationmachinery,cannotbesubstitutedforguanosinetoreceivethesameeffect.
KnockoutmicethatlackeitherADAR1orADAR2demonstratedthatA-to-IRNAeditingisessentialfornormallifeanddevelopment.HomozygousdisruptionofADAR1inmiceisembryoniclethal(atE11.5–12.5),mostprobablyduetodefectivehematopoiesisandliverdisintegration(52,53).ADAR2À/Àmiceareviablebutpronetoseiz-uresanddieshortlyafterbirth.Thisphenotypeisduetounder-editingoftheQ/RsiteinGluR-Bpre-mRNAtranscriptssinceADAR2À/Àmicewerephenotypicallyrescuedbyinsertionofgenomicallymu-tatedGluR-BRalleles,whichrestoredexpressionoftheeditedformofGluR-BattheQ/Rsite(54).
DysregulationofRNAeditingwaslinkedtoseveralhumandis-eases.ReducededitingofGluR-Bpre-mRNAattheQ/Rsitehasbeensuggestedtoleadtomotorneurondeathinsporadicamyotrophiclateralsclerosis(55).Alterededitinglevelsofserotoninreceptor5-HT2CRtranscriptswerefoundintheprefrontalcortexofsuicidevictimsandinneuropsychiatricdisorderssuchasdepressionandschizophrenia(56).ThedirectinvolvementofA-to-Ieditingincancerhasnotbeenextensivelyaddressedexperimentally.However,corre-lationsaswellasalimitednumberofexperimentalmodelsindicatethatA-to-Ieditingisseverelydysregulatedincancer(57),allowingustodrawsomeimportantconclusionsthatarethesubjectofthisreview.Ofnote,notonlyailmentbutalsohealthwasassociatedwithediting:single-nucleotidepolymorphismsinADAR2andADAR3wereasso-ciatedwithexceptionallongevityindifferentpopulations(58).
ThebroadinvolvementofA-to-IRNAeditinginregulationofgeneexpressionthroughdifferentcellularmechanismstogetherwithitscancer-correlateddysregulationraisethequestionofhowthesealter-ationsinRNAmoleculescanleadtotransformationandtumorprogression.
Acodewithinacode:aframeworkforunderstandingtheeditingcodeanditsdecoding
Asmentionedabove,A-to-Ieditingsitesfoundinthetranscriptomecanbebroadlydividedintotwogroups:‘site-speci?c’editingeventsofselectadenosineresiduesandnon-selective‘hyperediting’clusters.TheseclustersprimarilyoccurwithinAlurepeatsduetotheirten-1570
dencytoformtherequireddsRNAstructures.ItisinstructivetofurtherdistinguishbetweenthosesiteslocatedincodingsequencesandthoseinUTRsandintrons.Editingeventsincodingregionsarelargelysite-speci?c,whilehypereditingcharacterizesUTRsandin-trons.HowcanwemakesenseofthesecategoriesspecifyingpatternsandlocationsfurthercompoundedbytheirdiscoveryindifferentfunctionalclassesofRNAmolecules?
Lookingaroundforadditionalhypothesizedlevelsofinformationandregulationissurprisinglysendingustimeandagainbacktothe‘inert’geneticmaterialforanswers,justtorealizeitcontainsmorethanmeetstheeye.Itisbecomingincreasinglyclearerthatthesamegeneticsequenceissometimesrequiredtosimultaneouslyencodedifferenttypesofinformation(59).Arecentstudydemonstratedthattheapparentlyredundant‘geneticcode’isnotsoredundantafterall:differentcodonsforthesameaminoacidmayaffectthespeedoftranslationandinturnspecifyposttranslationalmodi?cations(60).Themeaningissimpleyetstriking:posttranslationalmodi?cationsareencodedinthemRNAsequence.Doesaninosinehavemorethanonemeaning?
The?rstofthe‘editingcodes’wasinhindsightalreadyapparentwhenA-to-IeditingwasinitiallyrecognizedasonlyanRNAduplexunwindingactivityinXenopuslaevisembryos(25,61,62).Welaterlearnedthateditingcanalsoresultinstabilizationofsecondarystruc-tures(bytargetingA–Cbasepairmismatches)(3,21,22,63,64).Eventhoughthesigni?canceofthisoutcomeisstillunresolved,itiscon-ceivablethatbyvirtueofin?uenceonsecondarystructureofUTRs,transcripttranslatabilityandinteractionwithRNA-bindingproteinscanbemodulated.Inosineequalseffectonsecondarystructureisthekeytothiscode.
TheearliestandprototypicalexamplesofA-to-IRNAediting,namelyGluRsand5-HT2cRs,taughtusthatthetranslationalmachinerydecodesinosineasifitwereguanosine(42)(becauseofitsWatson–Crickbasepairingwithcytidine)leadingtoproteinrecodingaffectingstructureandfunction(43,65).Thissecondeditingcodeisintegratedintothehigher-ordergeneticcode.Itwaslaterdemonstratedtoapplytoothersystemsaswell(suchassplicing)(9).Inosineequalsguanosineisthekeytothiscode.
OurunderstandingofthebiologicalmeaningofAluhypereditingisstillinitsinfancy,albeititconstitutesthevastmajorityofeditingsites.ArecentstudyevenestimatedthecontributionofAlueditingtotran-scriptomediversityisdramaticallyhigherthanthatofalternativesplic-ing(66).Isitindeedso?Thediscoveryofproteinswithauniquespeci?citytowardinosinealone(thatcannotbemimickedbyguano-sine),beitbindingaf?nityabletoretaineditedtranscriptsinthenucleus(p54nrb)(50)orendonucleolyticactivityabletodegradethem(Tudor-SN)(48),isamanifestationofanemergingthirdeditingcodeemployingyetotherdecoders,whereevidentlyadifferentkeyapplies:inosineequalsinosine.Theaf?nityofthep54nrbcomplexforinosinesprobablydependsmoreontheirquantityanddensitythanonexactlocationandcombinationalongtheAlu.Estimatingtheimpactofthiscodemorelikelyrequiresuseofmeasuresotherthannominaldiversity.Risingabovethedifferentcodes,itshouldbestressedthatthecellularoutcomeofA-to-Ieditingisultimatelydependentonthefunctionsofthetranscriptsbeingedited.Thereforeandbringingusclosertothefocusofthisarticle,theeditingphenomenonasawholedoesnot?ttheconceptualdichotomybetweentumorsuppressorsandoncogenes.Actingbyproxy,itcan,however,beresponsibleforacti-vatingaspeci?cproto-oncogeneorinactivatingaspeci?ctumorsup-pressor.Whereasthenetcellularphenotypeofeditingdysregulationisthesumofeffectsonindividualtranscripts—dependingoncelltypeandcircumstance,editingdysregulationofonlyonetranscriptmaystillaccountforthemostnotablephenotype(i.e.theeditedversionofGluR-BisabletosolelyrescueADAR2À/Àmice)(54).
WhenwedetectthesignatureofA-to-IRNAeditinginatranscript,weshouldaskourselves:whatisthecodespeci?edbyinosinesinthisinstance?Whodecodesit?Notingwhatkindoftranscriptitisandwhereinthetranscripteditingoccursmayassistus.Weshouldalsokeepinmindthatsometimesthesameeditingsitecanbewrittenintwodifferentcodestobereadconsecutivelyorcompetitivelybytwo
Downloaded from http://wendang.chazidian.com/ at Fudan University on November 16, 2014
腺苷和致癌
decoders(67).ThedifferentcodesadoptedbytheRNAeditingmachinerywillguideourdiscussion.Itwillbeinterestingto?ndoutwhatothercodesinosinesandADARshaveinstoreforus.
Thecancereditome:initialattemptstounderstandtheconnectionbetweeneditingandcarcinogenesis
TheconsiderableimpactofA-to-IRNAeditingongeneexpressiontogetherwithoccurrenceofeditingeventswithintumorsuppressorsandoncogenes(68)warrantanin-depthinvestigationintopossibleinvolvementofeditingincancer.ApartialsurveyoftranscriptomesisolatedfromdifferentsolidtumorsandmatchingcontrolstoassessthefrequencyofeditingeventsfoundincodingaswellasinUTRsrevealsacomplexpicturethatcanbebestsummarizedasfollows:thefrequencyofeditingissigni?cantlydifferentincancercomparedwithnormaltissues;althoughclustersofeditingeventswithinrepetitiveAluelementsaremostlyhypoeditedintumors,site-speci?ceditinglevelsareconsistentlyalteredbutlackajointtrend;braintumorsexhibitthemostsigni?cantdifferences(57).Editinglevelsinhema-tologicalmalignancieshavenotbeencomprehensivelyexamined,exceptforasinglestudythatreportedaneweditingeventoccurringatanintronbranchpointofproteintyrosinephosphatase,non-receptortype6(PTPN6)transcriptsisolatedfrompatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia(69).Thesealterededitingpatternsarereminiscentofthecancer-associatedDNAmethylationpro?leofglobalhypome-thylationinrepetitivesequencesaccompaniedbysite-speci?chyper-methylationinnon-repeatDNAstretches,frequentlyassociatedwithpromoterregions(70).Maasetal.(71)werethe?rsttodemonstratehypoeditingoftheGluR-BQ/Rsiteinadultglioblastomamultiformeandinsodoingprovidedauniqueexampleinwhichthede?nedphysiologicaloutcomeofhypoediting(assemblyofCa2þ-permeablealpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-typegluta-matereceptors)possiblyexplainssomeaspectsoftumorbehaviorandsymptomatology(epilepticseizures).Furtherexperimentalworkinpediatricglioblastomamultiformeproducedsimilar?ndings(72).Whatiscausingthechangeineditinglevels?Asregulatorymech-anismsgoverningtheeditingmachineryarelargelyunknown,re-searchfocusedonassessingfunctionandexpressionofADARenzymes.Onceagain,the?ndingsdonotlendthemselvestoeasyinterpretation.ExperimentalworkonbraintumorsdemonstratedlossofADAR2activity(responsibleforGluR-Bediting)withoutreduc-tionofitsmRNAexpression,sidebysidewithelevationofADAR1andADAR3mRNAlevels(72).Inanotherstudy,mRNAlevelsofallthreeADARfamilymemberswerereducedingliomasofvaryinggrades(57).Childhoodacuteleukemias,andespeciallynewlydiag-nosedB-celllymphoblasticleukemias(B-ALL),exhibitasigni?cantoverexpressionofonlytheconstitutiveADAR1isofrom(p110),withadramaticdecreaseinitslevelinpatientsachievingcompleteremis-sion(73).Attemptingtointerpretthe?ndingsonemustkeepinmindthatADARsnormallyfunctionpredominantlyashomodimers(18).ADAR1overexpression,eveninthesettingofunchangedADAR2levels,probablytipsthebalanceandleadstoADAR1/ADAR2heter-odimerformation,thusinterferingwiththespeci?ceditingactivityofthelatter(72).Alternatively,theobserveddown-regulationofallthreeenzymes—importantlynottothesamedegree—maytheoreticallycausesimultaneoushypoeditingofonetranscriptandhypereditingofanother.AsproposedbyGalloetal.(74),amodelofprogressivelydevelopingimbalanceinexpressionofADARfamilymembersduringtumorevolutionhasapowertoreconciletheapparentlyincongruentexpressionofADARs’indifferenttumors.Onemustkeepinmind,though,thatthisproposedmodelreliesonevidencelimitedtotheexpressionofdeaminasesandhencethattheperturbationofother,yetunknown,regulatorymechanismsmightalsoberesponsiblefortheobservedchangesineditinglevels.
Naturally,thequestioniswhetherthereareanyhintsthatthechangeineditinglevelshasacausalrelationshiptomalignanttrans-formation(initiation);oralternatively—doesthemalignantpheno-typedependtosomeextentonthischange(progression),implyingA-to-IRNAeditingmeetscancerthatrestoringediting‘balance’wouldhelpcurbcancer?Themostcompellingevidencesuggestingtheanswertothelatterquestionisyes,atleastinbraintumors,wasprovidedusingtwomainapproaches:(i)rectifyingaspeci?chypo-editedtranscript:conversionofCa2þ-permeablealpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-typeglutamatereceptorstoCa2þ-impermeablereceptorsthroughgenedeliveryincreasedapoptosisandsuppressedproliferationofadultglioblastomamultiformecells(75,76);(ii)reinstatingADAR‘balance’:overexpressionofADAR2inastrocytomacelllinesre-storededitinglevelsandregressedthemalignantphenotypeintermsofcellgrowthandmigration(72).Moreover,correlationsestablishedbetweenactivity/expressionofADARsandtumorgradefurtherimplyeditingdysregulationhasaroleincancerprogression(57,72).Asforinitiation,evidenceimplicatingeditingdysregulationasanearly‘hit’alongtheslopeendinginmalignanttransformationislacking:noincreaseincancerincidencewasreportedineitheranimalmodelsofRNAeditingdysregulation(54,77–83)orhumansubjectssufferingfromthepigmentarydisorderdyschromatosissymmetricahereditariawhichcarryheterozygousnullmutationsinADAR1(84,85).Judgingbyallaboveobservations,whileunlikelytobeanearlyinitiatinghit,editingdysregulation—beitbywayofmutationinADARgenesorotherepigeneticprocesses—seemstocontributetotumorprogressionandhenceoughttoberegardedasa‘drivermutation’.Evidently,thoughRNAeditinghasalargeimpactongeneexpres-sion,wearestillunabletodrawastraightlineconnectingtranscript-speci?cediting—leadingforexampletoproto-oncogeneactivationortumorsuppressorinactivation—andcarcinogenesis(Figure1).Solongaswearededucingfromfacevalueofdeaminaseexpressionwewillnotbeabletodecipherthenetworklogicofeditingdysregu-lation.Thealpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-typeglutamatereceptorsubunitGluR-Bistheonlyeditingtargetwithanestablishedbearingoncancer.AnovelconnectionbetweenRNAeditingandmodulationofDNAdamagerepairwasrecentlymadewhenanADAR1-mediatededitingeventwasidenti?edintheDNArepairenzymeNEIL1,abaseexcisionrepairglycosylase(86,87).Thissite-speci?ceventcausesalysinetoargininechangeinthelesionrecognitionloopoftheprotein,thuseffectivelychangingitsglyco-sylaseactivityandlesionspeci?city.ItistemptingtospeculatethatthisisaroutethroughwhichRNAeditingaffectsthenumberandtypesofmutationsthataccumulateingenomesofcancercells.Not-withstanding,theanalysispresentedabove,basedoncorrelationsbe-tweeneditinglevelsandcancerousstatesaswellasonpreliminarygeneticmanipulationsofADARs,stillenablesustoimplicateeditingdysregulationasaprobablecausativeagentincancerprogression.Wenowturntoexaminepossibleexplanationsatthemolecularlevel.CancerstemcellsTheenormousprogressachievedinthegeneralstemcell?eldinrecentyearshasfueledeffortsto?ndcorollariesincancer.Accordingtotheleanestinterpretationofthecancerstemcellhypothesis,tumorsare‘organs’composedofaheterogeneoushierarchyofevolvingmalignantcellsderivedfromandmaintainedbyauniquesubpopula-tionofcellswith‘stemcell’properties:namely,self-renewalandtheabilitytodifferentiateandcreatetherepertoiremakingupthetumor,togetherendowingthemwithauniquelysustainedtumorigenicpotential(88).Whereastheexactnatureofthispopulation(i.e.size,quiescence,markersandchemosensitivity),itshomogeneityandrelationtosomatictissuestemcellsarestillunderdebate,itisclear,fromaclinicalperspective,thattumoreradicationwillonlybeachievedthroughtargetedtherapythataddressestheuniquepropertiesofthecancerstemcellsubpopulation(89).Insomehematologicalmalignancies,evidencesuggeststhatleuke-miastemcells(LSCs)arederivedfromnormalhematopoieticstemcells(HSCs),whichacquiredinitialgenetichits(90–93).Recently,twostudiesinmice,elaboratingontheinitialobservationofdefectivehematopoiesisinADAR1À/Àmice,haverevealedthespeci?cimpor-tanceofADAR1forthemaintenanceoftheHSCcompartment,pos-siblybysuppressionoftheinterferonsignalingpathwayand
1571Downloaded from http://wendang.chazidian.com/ at Fudan University on November 16, 2014
腺苷和致癌
D.Dominissinietal.
Fig.1.A-to-IRNAeditingsitescanbedividedintotwogroups:selectivesite-speci?ceditingandnon-selectivehypereditingclustersthatoccurmainlyinnon-codingsequences.Selectiveeditingmayresultinproteinrecodingwhenoccurringwithincodingsequences(A)oralterationofsplicesites
(B).Non-selectivehypereditingcanin?uencegeneexpressionthroughseveralmechanisms:alteringmicroRNAbindingsites(C);shorteningof3#UTRsbynucleasesthatactoninosine-containingRNAsandnuclearretentionbyp54nrb(D).Allthesechangesmayresultinactivationofoncogenesorinactivationoftumorsuppressorgenes,thusleadingtotumorigenesis.
consequentprotectionofHSCs(52,78,94).ADAR1absencecausedvirus,hepatitisBvirus,humanpapillomavirus,humanherpesvirus8,hematopoieticprogenitorcellstoundergoincreasedapoptosisandhepatitisCvirus,humanT-lymphotropicvirustypeIandmolluscumpreventedthemfromformingdifferentiatedcolonieswhileexhaustingcontagiosumvirusareetiologicagentsin10–15%ofhumancancersHSCsduetocontinuousactivation(94).Itisplausiblethattheuniqueworldwide(100).Inthecaseofviral-inducedcancer,themolecularqualitiesADAR1conferstonormalHSCs(forexample:interferonbasisofhostsusceptibilityallowingforpersistentviralinfectionisofsignalingsuppression,anti-apoptosisandquiescence)wouldalsoobviousimportancebutislargelyunknown.InfectiousagentstriggerserveLSCs,asmanymarkersarecommontobothHSCsandLSCsanin?ammatoryresponsethatprecedestumordevelopmentaspartof(91,93).Theef?ciencyofinterferontherapyinchronicmyeloidleu-thenormalhostdefensedirectedatpathogenelimination.However,kemiamightsupportthisnotion(95,96).Itmaybearguedthatthetumorigenicvirusesdevisedingeniouswaystounderminehostim-globalhypoeditingaccompaniedbyADAR1down-regulationseeninmunityandestablishpersistentinfectionscausinglowintensitybutvarioushumantumorscontradictsapossibleroleforADAR1inLSCchronicin?ammation(101,102).Hostreactiontoviralinfectionclas-maintenance(57).Whereasthisobservationwasmadeinsolidtu-sicallytakestwoforms:(i)innateimmunitycharacterizedbyarapidmors,arecentstudyshowedthatADAR1isactuallyup-regulatedandgenericresponse,(ii)adaptiveimmunitycharacterizedbyahighlyinacutechildhoodleukemias(73),possiblyre?ectingadifferentrolespeci?cresponse,whichalsoconfersfutureresistance.ForclarityofforADAR1inthesetwobroadcancercategories.Itbringstomindtheourdiscussion,itisinstructivetofurtherdistinguishbetweeneditingapparentpuzzlingdiscrepancybetweenpromyelocyticleukemiaofhostcellularRNAsandeditingofviralRNAs.Aswillbedescribedproteinlevelsandfunctioninsolidtumors(anestablishedtumorbelow,theeditingmachineryhasacentralroleinbotharmsandsuppressor,wherelossofpromyelocyticleukemiaproteinpredictsin?uencescellularaswellasviralRNAsinthesettingofinfectionanunfavorableprognosis)versusinchronicmyeloidleukemiastemandin?ammation(103).
cells(whereitisresponsibleformaintainingthequiescenceofLSCs,Beginningwitharoleinimmunecelldevelopment—asmentionedanditslosspredictsafavorableoutcome)todemonstrateourpointaboveinthe‘cancerstemcell’section,ADAR1isnecessaryforHSC(97,98).Takentogether,webelieveADAR1isprobablyimportantformaintenanceandhencematurationofcellsbelongingtobothinnatethesurvivalofsomeLSCcompartmentsandthereforemightserveasandadaptivearmsoftheimmunesystemisdependentonit.Interest-avaluabletargetinfuturetherapy.inginthisregardisthesuggestedunderlyingmechanism:suppressionEditingandimmunityoftheinterferonsignalingpathwayandconsequentprotectionof
HSCsfromapoptosis(94).Continuingwitharoleinimmunecell
Chronicin?ammationandcancerdevelopmentaretightlyconnectedfunction—up-regulationofADAR1inlymphocytesfollowingstimu-
(99).Chronicinfectionsarechiefexogenousinducersofin?amma-lationwithavarietyofin?ammatorymediators(tumornecrosisfac-tion,responsibleforroughly20%ofallcancers.Bynow,itis?rmlytor-a,interferon-c)resultsineditingofhostcellularRNAs,possiblyestablishedthatatleastsevenhumanviruses,namelyEpstein-Barrcontributingtoproliferationanddifferentiationoflymphocytes
内容需要下载文档才能查看(36).1572Downloaded from http://wendang.chazidian.com/ at Fudan University on November 16, 2014
腺苷和致癌
Asforeditingasadirectantiviralmechanism—sincemostRNAviruseslocalizetothecytoplasm,theADAR1p150isoform,beinginterferon-inducibleandcytoplasmic,isoneoftheseveraleffectorsbelongingtothe?rstlineofinnateimmunedefensesagainstviralinfection(104,105).Assuch,ithasprovenrolesineditingoftheHCVRNAgenomeresultingininhibitionofitsreplication(106).ItalsoeditstheHHV-8Kaposintranscripteliminatingitstransformingactivity(107).AswillbediscussedingreaterdetailinthemicroRNAsectionbelow,editingofEBV-encodedmicroRNAswasshowntodictatevirallatency(108).
InsupportofadirectantiviralfunctionforADAR1arethespeci?cinhibitorsdevelopedbyadenoandvacciniavirusesagainstitsenzy-maticactivity(109,110).Notunexpectedly,recentstudiesdemon-stratesomeviruses(HIVandvesicularstomatitisvirus,forexample)evolvedspeci?cfeaturestakingadvantageoftheeditingsystemandharnessingittoaidtheirreplication,therebymakingADAR1aviral‘accomplice’(111,112).
Surprising,andespeciallyilluminating,istheproviraleffectexertedbyADAR1throughdirectinhibitionofdsRNA-activatedproteinkinase(PKR),aninterferon-induciblekinasewithacentralroleinantiviralimmunity(113,114).Thisresponse,counteractinganotherantiviralpathwaytoblockapoptosisandassistviralreplica-tion,wasdemonstratedformeaslesvirus,vesicularstomatitisvirusandHIV-1.Itcompromisestheabilityofthehostto?ghtinfection,ineffectpromotingchronicin?ammation,butthroughdirectmodula-tionofahostproteinandnotthroughaviralintermediate.Isityetanotherexampleofviralmanipulation?TakingintoaccountthatADAR1isalsoasuppressorofinterferonsignaling(78),potentiallyprotectingtheorganismagainstitsunleasheddetrimentalactivation,andwasalsoshowntonegativelyregulateimmuneresponseactivatedbycytosolicDNA(115),theanswerisprobablynot.WebelievethatitmanifeststheroleofADAR1inkeepingantiviralresponseincheck.ThisapparentcontradictionwasrecentlyaddressedbyGatignoletal.(113)whostressedthebiasednatureofourconceptionofcellresponsesolelyintendedtocounteractviralreplication.Consideringthateveryphysiologicalresponseistheresultofco-evolutionofviruseswiththeirhosts,itmightbemoresuitabletoviewthesituationasequilibriumbetweentheneedtoavoiddeathduetoviralreplicationandtheneedtoavoiddeathduetohyperactiveimmuneresponse.
ThecomplexinteractionsoutlinedabovesuggestthatADAR1isverypertinenttothebasichost–viralinteractionsdeterminingthepersistencyofviralinfection.ADAR1isnoteasilyclassi?edaspro-viralorantiviral,neitherwhenconsideringtheoutcomeofviralin-fectionnorwhenregardingitasaneffectoroftheinterferonsystem.WeproposethatADAR1inductioninviralinfectionessentiallyservestocombatvirusesthroughdirecteditingoftheirtranscripts(amech-anismsometimesoutsmartedbyviruses)andatthesametimetomodulateandlimittheinterferonin?ammatoryresponse.Therefore,itappearsA-to-IRNAediting,andADAR1inparticular,arekeydeterminantsofpersistentinfection,consequentchronicin?ammationandresultantcancerrisk.
Fightingretrotransposon-mediated‘naturalmutagenesis’
‘Insertionalmutagenesis’ofproto-oncogenesandtumorsuppressorsbymobilegeneticelementscanparticipateincarcinogenesis(116,117).Normalcellsmanagetoprotectthemselvesagainstadversemutageniceffectsin?ictedbyendogenousretrotransposons(Alu,longinterspersedelement1)throughtheuseofmethylation,siRNAsandotherapproaches(118).Althoughtherepressiveeffectsofthesemechanismsarepartlyrelievedincancer(globalhypomethylation),ithasbeendif?culttodetermineifretrotransposonsareconsequently‘jumping’inthegenomesofhumantumorcellsandtowhatextenttheyareinvolvedingenomicinstabilityandcancerdevelopment(119).Iskowetal.(120)recentlydemonstratedsuchdenovosomaticinsertionsarequitefrequentinnon-small-celllungcancerandpro-videdfurtherevidenceinfavorofacausativerelationbetweenDNAdemethylationandextensiveretrotransposonmobilizationintumors.A-to-IRNAeditingmeetscancerDeaminatingmostlyretrotransposon-deriveddsRNAs—isA-to-Ieditinganotherbarrieragainstretrotransposition?Isthecancer-associatedbreachofeditingdefenselinessomewhatresponsiblefortheobservedmobilizationandinsertionofretrotransposons?Severallinesofpreliminaryevidencepointtointriguinginteractionsoftheeditingsystemperhapsenablingittowardoffretrotransposonsbutarestilltoounripetoanswertheposedquestionsintheaf?rmative.Beforeproceedingtomentionmoreintricateandindirectproposedmechanisms,itisworthmentioningprobablythemoststraightfor-wardone—directeditingofretrotransposonsequencesmaydamagethemandpreventtheirintegrationbackintothegenome.EndogenoussiRNAsformedoutofretrotransposon-deriveddsRNAstargettheirparenttranscriptsresultingintheirsuppression(121).ADAR2,equippedwiththeabilitytohyperedittheparenttran-scripts,canpreventDicer,atleastinvitro,fromcleavingthem,therebysuppressingmaturesiRNAgeneration(49).Inaddition,ADARsavidlybindmaturesiRNAs,decreasingtheireffectivecon-centration,therebycompetingwithRNA-inducedsilencingcomplexandreducingtheef?ciencyofRNAinterference(122).Alternatively,editingexposestheparenttranscriptstotheendonucleolyticactivityofTudor-SNdirectedspeci?callyagainstinosine-containingdsRNAs(48,49).Theoutcomeofthesecompetingforcesintermsofanti-retrotransposonactivityisnotclearandhasnotbeenputtoexperi-mentaltest.TheremightbeyetanotherroutethroughwhichRNAeditingpar-ticipatesinepigeneticsilencingofretrotransposonactivityaspartofcelldefensemechanisms.Thediscoverythatvigilinscanbindinosine-containingRNAandarealsoinacomplexcontainingADAR1indicatesapossibleinvolvementinaheterochromaticsilencingmechanism(123).Accordingtoaproposedscenario,ADAR1hypereditsdsRNAstranscribedfromgenomiclociharboringrepetitiveelements;these,inturn,arerecognizedbyvigilins,whichrecruitadditionalfactorsneededtotransformtheregionintoheterochromatintherebysuppressingtheexpressionofretrotransposons.EditingofmicroRNAsMicroRNAsaresmallnon-codingRNAsthatactasposttranscrip-tionalrepressorsofgeneexpression(124).Similartotheeditingmachinery,theeffectsofmicroRNAsonfundamentalcellularprocessesareonlyunderstoodwhenconsideringthedownstreamfunctionsofthetranscriptstheytargetinaspeci?ccelltypeanddifferentiationstate.TheinvolvementofmicroRNAsinprocessesdrivingcancerinitiationandfuelingprogressionandmetastasisarebynowwellestablished(125).DistinctivelyaberrantmicroRNAex-pressionpro?lescharacterizingvariouscancerslieatthebaseoftheprevailinghypothesisassigningtumorsuppressorrolestodown-regulatedmicroRNAs(thatnormallydown-regulatetheexpressionofanoncogenes)andoncogenerolestoup-regulatedones(thatnor-mallydown-regulatetheexpressionofatumor-suppressor)(126).VariousmechanismshelpmicroRNAsescapestrictexpressionregu-lationincancer,rangingfromstructuralgenomic(translocation,ampli?cation,deletion),throughepigenetic(promoterhypermethyla-tion,histonehypoacetylation)todefectsinbiogenesis(transcriptionrepression/activation,Drosha/Dicerloss)(127).Thestem-loopsecondarystructureadoptedbyprimarymicroRNAs(pri-microRNAs)andmicroRNAprecursors(pre-microRNAs)ena-blesinteractionbetweentheA-to-Ieditingmachineryandthemicro-RNAbiogenesispathway.Nishikuraetal.haveconvincinglydemonstratedhoweditingeventsinpri-andpre-microRNAsblocktheprocessingcascadebyinterferingwithDroshaorDicercleavagesteps,resultinginreducedlevelsofmaturemicroRNAs(44,45).Dependingontheposition,wheneditingeventsdonotinterferewithenzymaticcleavage,theycanendupinmaturemicroRNAswithapotentialtoredirecttheirtargetspeci?city(46).Attheotherendoftheequation,extensiveA-to-IeditingofmRNA3#UTRsmayaddtoregulationofmicroRNAactivitythroughmodulation,creationoreliminationofbindingsites(47).Additionally,theresultingstabili-zation/destabilizationofthesecondarystructureoftargetregionsmay
1573Downloaded from http://wendang.chazidian.com/ at Fudan University on November 16, 2014
下载文档
热门试卷
- 2016年四川省内江市中考化学试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 山东省滨州市三校2017届第一学期阶段测试初三英语试题
- 四川省成都七中2017届高三一诊模拟考试文科综合试卷
- 2017届普通高等学校招生全国统一考试模拟试题(附答案)
- 重庆市永川中学高2017级上期12月月考语文试题
- 江西宜春三中2017届高三第一学期第二次月考文科综合试题
- 内蒙古赤峰二中2017届高三上学期第三次月考英语试题
- 2017年六年级(上)数学期末考试卷
- 2017人教版小学英语三年级上期末笔试题
- 江苏省常州西藏民族中学2016-2017学年九年级思想品德第一学期第二次阶段测试试卷
- 重庆市九龙坡区七校2016-2017学年上期八年级素质测查(二)语文学科试题卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016年12月八年级语文阶段性测试卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016-2017学年七年级英语12月阶段检测试卷
- 山东省邹城市第八中学2016-2017学年八年级12月物理第4章试题(无答案)
- 【人教版】河北省2015-2016学年度九年级上期末语文试题卷(附答案)
- 四川省简阳市阳安中学2016年12月高二月考英语试卷
- 四川省成都龙泉中学高三上学期2016年12月月考试题文科综合能力测试
- 安徽省滁州中学2016—2017学年度第一学期12月月考高三英语试卷
- 山东省武城县第二中学2016.12高一年级上学期第二次月考历史试题(必修一第四、五单元)
- 福建省四地六校联考2016-2017学年上学期第三次月考高三化学试卷
- 甘肃省武威第二十三中学2016—2017学年度八年级第一学期12月月考生物试卷
网友关注
- 合同管理
- 大学同学关系
- 小说期末报告
- 彼此彼此
- 心手相连 送培传情—语文学科活动小结(洪冬梅)
- 古代文学期末复习
- 14-15上西方文学名著鉴赏课程论文A
- 专升本语文复习材料
- 结束语
- 近代文学资料
- 图书分类详细3
- 人生若只如初见——纳兰容若(2)
- 7正文(1)
- 早梅 齐己
- 管理学艺术诗集
- 快乐心理学
- 电大护理科研方法作业及答案
- Frozen
- 我辈岂是蓬蒿人
- 定向运动课程纲要Microsoft Word 文档
- Causes of abnormal genital tract bleeding in women
- 新建 个人与团队管理88分
- 社区康复课程实验教学大纲
- 2014整理版 正常人体解剖学复习思考题
- 英国风情
- 公邮(讲义精核)
- 西医内科学复习资料 (1)
- 生理教学大纲
- 柏章丽2015年论文
- 阳光下的思念
网友关注视频
- 人教版历史八年级下册第一课《中华人民共和国成立》
- 【获奖】科粤版初三九年级化学下册第七章7.3浓稀的表示
- 3.2 数学二年级下册第二单元 表内除法(一)整理和复习 李菲菲
- 外研版英语七年级下册module1unit3名词性物主代词讲解
- 苏科版数学 八年级下册 第八章第二节 可能性的大小
- 苏科版数学七年级下册7.2《探索平行线的性质》
- 七年级英语下册 上海牛津版 Unit5
- 北师大版数学四年级下册3.4包装
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 8.练习八_第一课时(特等奖)(苏教版三年级上册)_T142692
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《老山界》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 北师大版八年级物理下册 第六章 常见的光学仪器(二)探究凸透镜成像的规律
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 3
- 《空中课堂》二年级下册 数学第一单元第1课时
- 沪教版八年级下次数学练习册21.4(2)无理方程P19
- 外研版英语三起5年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit1
- 苏科版数学八年级下册9.2《中心对称和中心对称图形》
- 北师大版数学 四年级下册 第三单元 第二节 小数点搬家
- 化学九年级下册全册同步 人教版 第25集 生活中常见的盐(二)
- 8 随形想象_第一课时(二等奖)(沪教版二年级上册)_T3786594
- 外研版英语七年级下册module3 unit2第一课时
- 二年级下册数学第三课 搭一搭⚖⚖
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 7
- 外研版英语三起6年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit1
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《老山界》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 冀教版小学英语四年级下册Lesson2授课视频
- 冀教版英语五年级下册第二课课程解读
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册1
- 人教版二年级下册数学
精品推荐
- 2016-2017学年高一语文人教版必修一+模块学业水平检测试题(含答案)
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
分类导航
- 互联网
- 电脑基础知识
- 计算机软件及应用
- 计算机硬件及网络
- 计算机应用/办公自动化
- .NET
- 数据结构与算法
- Java
- SEO
- C/C++资料
- linux/Unix相关
- 手机开发
- UML理论/建模
- 并行计算/云计算
- 嵌入式开发
- windows相关
- 软件工程
- 管理信息系统
- 开发文档
- 图形图像
- 网络与通信
- 网络信息安全
- 电子支付
- Labview
- matlab
- 网络资源
- Python
- Delphi/Perl
- 评测
- Flash/Flex
- CSS/Script
- 计算机原理
- PHP资料
- 数据挖掘与模式识别
- Web服务
- 数据库
- Visual Basic
- 电子商务
- 服务器
- 搜索引擎优化
- 存储
- 架构
- 行业软件
- 人工智能
- 计算机辅助设计
- 多媒体
- 软件测试
- 计算机硬件与维护
- 网站策划/UE
- 网页设计/UI
- 网吧管理