A STDY ON QUABTATIVE THEORETICAL ZONING OF WEATHERING ZONES IN ROCK MASS
上传者:孙昱东|上传时间:2015-04-22|密次下载
A STDY ON QUABTATIVE THEORETICAL ZONING OF WEATHERING ZONES IN ROCK MASS
A STUDY ON QUANTATIVE THEORETICAL ZONING OF WEATHERING ZONES IN ROCK MASS*
Dexin Nie1 and Long Chen1
ABSTRACT: Weathering agency can not only result in the variation of physical components and chemical components of rock, joints and integrality of rock mass change along with weathering process. Therefore better corresponding relation exists between amounts of joints, block size in rock mass and degree of weathering. In this paper, zones of weathering are characterized by joint spacing, integrality index of rock mass and rock quality designation, integrated closely with rock mass structure and their engineering properties. New research is carried out in quantitative classification of weathering zones and good results are also achieved in the paper.
RÉSUMÉ: Les mass de roche qui ont subi une érosion doivent avoir no seulement un changement en composition chimique, mais aussi en intégralité. Il existe donc une bonne relation entre la quantité de joints, la grandeur de bloc et le degré d'érosion.. Dans cet article nous avons étudié la zonation d'érosion de mass de roche sur la base de la distance des joints, de 'index de l'intégralité de mass de roche et du degré d'érosion. Cette étude a établi une relation entre la zonation, la structure et la propriété de génie civil des mass de roche. Nous avons proposé enfin une classification quantitative sur la zonation d'érosion des mass de roche.
INTRODUCTION
The research of rock weathering is an old theme. The term weathering is popular in the geology domain and other subjects for a long time. Whereas many artificial factors and uncertainty exist, the method of naked–eye observation and the blow sound of geological hammer is still used so far. This is one convenient, economical and fast means. To recognize the partition of weathering zone by historical and developmental viewpoint not only follows the action of the previous partition in evaluation of engineering geology but also objectively points out its question. In practical use, adding some new quantificational indexes which denote weathering degree, on the one hand can foretype the variation degree, on the other hand can also reflect influencing degree of weathering to rock mass structure and engineering characteristic. The partition of weathering is not only reflect weathering and integrality and structure of rock mass, but also indicate integrated partition of rock mass engineering characteristic. It is a direction that is paid attention to in geological study.
According to above-mentioned, at present research of rock weathering, technologists must attach importance both to the change of color, structure of rock and the alteration degree of mineral, the change of knocking-sound, the developmental degree of fissure and integrality of rock mass as well as structure change. In addition, the correlation between weathering zones and mechanical character of rock mass must be paid more attention to. Some new contents should be endowed to the weathering zoning by summarizing the change of physical-chemistry and structure and engineering character of rock mass synthetically. This paper deals with some new advance in this research.
* Supported by National Nature Science Fund of China (40072090)
1.
内容需要下载文档才能查看Institute of Engineering Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, P.R.China
Engineering Geology for Developing Countries - Proceedings of 9th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment. Durban, South Africa, 16 - 20 September 2002 - J. L. van Rooy and C. A. Jermy, editors
Géologie de l'Ingénieur dans les Pays en voie de Développement - Comptes-rendus du 9ème Congrès de L'Association Internationale de Géologie de l'Ingénieur et de l'Environnement. Durban, Afrique du Sud, 16 - 20 septembre 2002 - J. L. van Rooy and C. A. Jermy, éditeurs
ISBN No. 0-620-28559-1 1258
RESEARCH SITUATION OF ZONING OF WEATHERING
In the past, people chiefly paid attention to the qualitative description of rock weathering, and use mostly the qualitative indexes in judging weathering degree; Table 1 is the scheme of hydroelectricity department in 60 to 80’s. Table 2 is the National Standard that was issued in 80’s. According to these two tables, there are few quantitative indexes, but mostly are qualitative descriptions. Consequently it is very difficult to apply them in rock engineering because of subjectivity and uncertainty.
Table 1. Classification scheme of weathering degree in rock mass
Leading features
Classification
Colour and luster
Mineral
characteristics of
characteristic
joints destroyed except quartz Structure character have been of virgin rock on weathered appearance
Mechanical property immersed in water. Not undisturbed sample collected
blow sound
Digging method
Excessively
Entirely changed
Silent
Shovel Pickaxe
Colour of Lots of Weathering Most minerals most joints. Rock mass except quartz is
Mechanic Hand-
changed, like rubble. weathered,
property picker
Intensely only the Weathering intensely fresh primary Silent
fall notably, Rock-
middle along joint planes, minerals only in
inhomogeneous auger
part were especially in the the middle of fresh intersection of joints rock block Colour of most
Saturation
surface Most primary
Undamaged usually compressive
and joint minerals are
Weathering joints strength fall
Moderately plane weathered Metallic Blasting
Weathering intensely notably, are 2/3
changed, along joint
along joint planes to 1/3 of fresh
fracture planes
rock
part were fresh Color of
Structure Minerals re
joint Mechanic
unchanged ,
内容需要下载文档才能查看unchanged
Slightly plane property Metallic Blasting
weathering joints Argillaceous
changed decrease
tiny film or crust
slightly
Table 2. Classification of weathering degree in rock mass (After National Criterion GBJ 7-89)
Weathering degree Characteristics
2. Rock mass is blocky, cut by joints, block size is 20 to 50 cm. Joints filled with little
Moderately
weathered material. Hammer blow sound is metallic. Rock mass be not easy to smash. 3. It’s difficult to excavate by pickaxe ,but can be dig by core drill
2. Rock mass is macadam, which cut by joints, and the block size is 2 to 20 cm and can be
Intensely
break by hand.
3. It can be excavated by pickaxe, digging by bit brace is difficult
1259
Since 70’s, many test indexes are introduced to the weathering evaluation. For instance, Chengdu Hydroelectricity Investigation and Design Institution of Station Power Corporation puts forward to the diversity of compression strength and water absorption between weathered rock and fresh rock.
[]Mugongyibang, Kehe Wei1use point load strength index of rock to describe weathering degree quantitatively.
But that index of rock can not completely reflect the character of rock mass, so it is difficult to operate in the evaluation of engineering rock mass. To solve these problems, many scholars in different departments
[][][][][][]investigate weathering zoning making use of some characteristic indexes of rock mass234567. For
example, Patton, Deere (1976) used RQD and rock penetrability in weathering zoning in the magmatic rock and metamorphic rock (Table 3); W.R.Dearman (1978) used RQD and seismic wave velocity to research weathering classification of granite (Table 4); The Chinese GB50287-99 standard uses wave velocity ratio to
[]research rock mass weathering17. All these quantitative indexes, such as RQD, longitudinal wave velocity
of rock mass and wave velocity ration etc, further the development of weathering classification research. In a way, RQD reflects the integrity of rock mass; longitudinal wave velocity of rock mass reflects density of medium in rock mass and compactibility of rock mass.Physical and chemical component change due to weathering, so does integrity of rock mass. From intensely weathered zone to moderately weathered zone to slightly weathered zone to fresh rock, the quantity of fissure gradually reducesand finally stabilizes at a certain value. This displays the character of crack propagation and increase and new fissure formation under the action of weathering agency, at the same time it embodies the variety of integrity. In engineering geology domain, quantitative research of weathering zoning must attach importance to the change of physical and chemical component as well as the change of integrity and structure of rock mass. Structure of rock mass controls
[]engineering geology character of rock mass and the stability of rock mass17, therefore those indexes which
have been applied in the research of rock mass structure extensively can be introduced into the classification of weathering zones. Undoubtedly, this will bring new insight to the research of weathering.
Table 3. Characteristics of magmatic rock and metamorphic rock in different weathering zones (After Patton,
Deere, 1976)
Core Infiltration Name Zone Characteristic RQD% Strength recovery -rate ratio
Soil on top, root, eluvial low~ 0 0 Moderate~low organism, much void in ⅠA—A moderate leached layer
Structure without residual Ⅰ Residual Low,high deposit, ferreous and 0 0 Low when ⅠB—B clay aluminiferous and cementation siliconous, cementation
Like silty sand to sand low~ 0 0~10 Moderate ⅠC—C Structure of virgin rock moderate
low~ like rock and soil, ⅡA 0~50 10~90 High moderate Transition spheroidal weathering, rock Ⅱ crushed Weathered
ⅡB zone Joint planes rusted, feldspar Moderate~
内容需要下载文档才能查看50~75 >0 Moderate~high Weathered and mica unchanged high rock
Feldspar and mica were Ⅲlow~ high~ unchanged, joint planes >75 100 Unweathered moderate very high were not rusted rock
1260
Table 4. Engineering property of granite in different weathering zones
(After W.R.Dearman, 1978)
Fresh rockAbsolutelyResidual clay Engineering SlightlyⅡ ModeratelyⅢ IntenselyⅣ characteristic Ⅰ Ⅴ Ⅵ
Fit to build Fit to build Fit to build Suitability for comcrete Fit to build not fit to build comcrete dam comcrete dam small earth engineering dam and earth dam dam and earth dam and earth dam dam earth dam
Lie on the Digging Demolishing Demolishing effect and burst effect Excavating Excavating method digging digging amount of joints Rock drill Burst Rock drill
1:1
1:0.25 1:0.25~1:1 Surface 1:1~1:1.5 Steepness of Notice Notice application Surface 1:1.5~1:2 1:1.5~1:2 slope obsequent obsequent Notice application structure structure obsequent
structure
Heavy steel Support except Steel Heavy steel, Support and lining Tunnel fissures zone Light steel structure, lining. except Dangerous support and obsequent structure part Dangerous to fissures zone to wet structure reinforce wet excavation excavation
Rock quality 0 or 0 or designation 90% 75~90% 50~75% 0~50% inapplicable inapplicable RQD
Core recovery 15% 15% 90% 90% 90~75% 15~75% (N.X) (sand-like ) (sand-like) Diamond
drilling 2~4m/hr 2~4m/hr 8~10m/hr 8~10m/hr 10~13m/hr 10~13m/hr velocity(N.X)
Moderate-StronPermeability Low Low-Moderate Strong Moderate Low g
Seismic wave 3050~ 2500~ 1500~ 1000~ 500~ 500~ longitudinal 5500 4000 3000 2000 1000 1000 velocity (m/s)
Electrical
resistivity 340 240~500 180~240 180~240 180 180 (ohm)
SELECTION OF THE REPRESENTATIONAL INDEXES OF SYNTHETICAL CLASSIFICATION
内容需要下载文档才能查看OF WEATHERING ZONES IN ROCK MASS AND THEIR CORRESPONDENCE
Selection of the representational indexes of synthetical classification of weathering zones in rock mass There are many factors that can indicate the character of weathering agency, they are : ① the variation of medium in rock mass, for instance: color of rock and mineral, mineral composition, density of rock, void rate, structure of rock, compressive strength of rock and tensile strength (or point load index )etc; ② the variation structural plane(or joint): including the variation of the quantity of joint, joint sets, length, spacing, property of the structural plane and the variation of aperture and type of filling material of structural plane; ③ the variation of characteristic of the rock mass because of weathering: the variation of rock mass integrality, rock mass structure and rock mass quality etc.
The above-mentioned qualitative or quantitative factors can denote the degree of weathering on a certain extent, but it is unrealistic to apply all numerous factors to classify weathering degree in rock mass synthetically and scientifically. On the basis of the availability of engineering rock mass, emphasis should be put on rock mass structure, which is the basic condition controlling engineering geological property and
1261
stability of rock mass in the classification of weathering zones in rock mass. Therefore, besides of some customary qualitative terms, other indexes that can indicate rock mass structure and apt to be obtained can be chosen in weathering zoning, such as rock quality designation (RQD), spacing of structural plane, coefficient of rock-mass sound-degree (or wave velocity and wave velocity ratio of rock mass), volumetric joint count (or linear in discretional direction). Among these indexes, joint spacing, volumetric joint count and line frequency of fissures can indicate rock block size variation, and joint spacing which can be measured easily in adits and outcrop is the leading index to classify rock mass structure. But joint spacing isn’t easy to achieve in drills and RQD is easy attained. RQD is an index indicating scale variation of structural body of rock mass in fact, but it can’t indicate the size of blocks that the size is more than 10cm. Coefficient of rock mass sound-degree or wave velocity, wave velocity ratio can indicate the variation of rock density and rock mass sound-degree, aperture of rock structural and character of filling substance. All these variation actually represented concentratedly the variation of rock structure and rock quality. The authors chose joint spacing (D) and rock quality designation (RQD) and coefficient of rock mass sound-degree (Kv) and volumetric joint count (Jv) as the quantitative indexes of classification of weathering zones to study the synthetical zoning of weathering in rock mass. Because joint spacing and coefficient of rock mass sound-degree are representative indexes to quantitate the rock mass structure. Using these indexes to zone the weathering we can connect zoning of the weathering with classification of structure of rock mass.
Study on relation among the leading representative indexes
The relation between rock quality designation and coefficient of rock mass sound-degree has been studied much by precursors. Dearman pointed out the corresponding relation between different weathering zones and RQD, A.H.Merrit (1968) proposed the relation between RQD and coefficient of rock mass sound-degree (Kv). We can get the corresponding relation in Table 5 through two scholar’s results. The author attained the well-relation formula through farther study on the relation of RQD and Kv:
Kv=-0.017183+0.00861(RQD)-0.00007822(RQD)2+0.000000894(RQD)3 (1) r1=0.964, r2=0.991, r3=0.996
In the formula, Kv represents coefficient of rock mass sound-degree; RQD represents rock quality designation ,and r1 and r2 and r3—related coefficients.
Table 5. Corresponding relations between rock quality designation, integrality coefficient and degree of
weathering in rock mass
Weathering Coefficient of rock mass RQD (%) Rock quality classification sound-degree Fresh rock 90~100 0.8~1.0 Very good
Slightly 75~90 0.6~0.8 Good 25~50 0.2~0.4 Relatively bad Intensely①
0~25 0~0.2 Bad Intensely②
The corresponding relation between joint spacing (D) and coefficient of rock mass sound-degree: cutting density of joint corresponds with degree of rock integrity in existing circumstance. The degree of rock integrity decline along with the density of joint’s increases (namely joint spacing’s reduction). The density of joint cutting has two representational indexes: one is joint spacing, another is volumetric joint count. Joint spacing has been used more than volumetric joint count. In practical applications, true joint spacing of the most developed group is used by many classifications of rock mass structure and the correlative standard. The author studied further on the relation of joint spacing and coefficient of rock mass and achieved the well-relational formula:
Kv=-0.1331+0.02106D-0.0001758D2
内容需要下载文档才能查看+0.0000005331D3
r1=0.89, r2=0.995, r3=1 (2)
1262
下载文档
热门试卷
- 2016年四川省内江市中考化学试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 山东省滨州市三校2017届第一学期阶段测试初三英语试题
- 四川省成都七中2017届高三一诊模拟考试文科综合试卷
- 2017届普通高等学校招生全国统一考试模拟试题(附答案)
- 重庆市永川中学高2017级上期12月月考语文试题
- 江西宜春三中2017届高三第一学期第二次月考文科综合试题
- 内蒙古赤峰二中2017届高三上学期第三次月考英语试题
- 2017年六年级(上)数学期末考试卷
- 2017人教版小学英语三年级上期末笔试题
- 江苏省常州西藏民族中学2016-2017学年九年级思想品德第一学期第二次阶段测试试卷
- 重庆市九龙坡区七校2016-2017学年上期八年级素质测查(二)语文学科试题卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016年12月八年级语文阶段性测试卷
- 江苏省无锡市钱桥中学2016-2017学年七年级英语12月阶段检测试卷
- 山东省邹城市第八中学2016-2017学年八年级12月物理第4章试题(无答案)
- 【人教版】河北省2015-2016学年度九年级上期末语文试题卷(附答案)
- 四川省简阳市阳安中学2016年12月高二月考英语试卷
- 四川省成都龙泉中学高三上学期2016年12月月考试题文科综合能力测试
- 安徽省滁州中学2016—2017学年度第一学期12月月考高三英语试卷
- 山东省武城县第二中学2016.12高一年级上学期第二次月考历史试题(必修一第四、五单元)
- 福建省四地六校联考2016-2017学年上学期第三次月考高三化学试卷
- 甘肃省武威第二十三中学2016—2017学年度八年级第一学期12月月考生物试卷
网友关注
- 五年级知识梳理
- 吉他课程教案
- 数学竞赛方案
- 2010年蛟川书院入学考试数学试卷
- 小学生体质健康测试评分全套标准
- 综合2 中村小学关于近期学生的安全监护责任告知单
- 小学生争当敬业好少年主题队活动
- “英语王杯”竞赛试题(六年级组)
- 2014六年级上11月份考试题
- 怎样评课
- 脑力冲击波答案
- 三年级英语知识竞赛
- 阳光心态,伴我成长
- 五年级知识梳理
- 分数应用题6
- 五科试卷
- 2.8 自然数串趣题
- 2014学年第一学期主持人社团考核材料
- 四年级综合实践活动计划
- “英语王杯”竞赛试题(六年级组)
- 第四册语文授课计划 2014
- 优秀教师事迹
- 四年级差倍问题作业2 2015.4.30 (2)
- 科学复习,迎接考试
- 真善美征文
- 三年级周一植树问题作业1 2015.5.4
- 与正方形有关的趣味问题
- 四年级100
- “英语王杯”竞赛试题(六年级组)
- 奥数练习1
网友关注视频
- 二年级下册数学第一课
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《过松源晨炊漆公店(其五)》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,辽宁省
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册1
- 北师大版数学四年级下册第三单元第四节街心广场
- 三年级英语单词记忆下册(沪教版)第一二单元复习
- 第8课 对称剪纸_第一课时(二等奖)(沪书画版二年级上册)_T3784187
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,广东省
- 小学英语单词
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,天津市
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 3
- 第五单元 民族艺术的瑰宝_16. 形形色色的民族乐器_第一课时(岭南版六年级上册)_T1406126
- 飞翔英语—冀教版(三起)英语三年级下册Lesson 2 Cats and Dogs
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用)五年级下册 Unit 1
- 苏教版二年级下册数学《认识东、南、西、北》
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二周第2课时《我们的测量》宝丰街小学庞志荣.mp4
- 外研版英语三起5年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit2
- 七年级英语下册 上海牛津版 Unit3
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,辽宁省
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 8
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《老山界》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 七年级下册外研版英语M8U2reading
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《泊秦淮》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,湖北省
- 二年级下册数学第二课
- 第12章 圆锥曲线_12.7 抛物线的标准方程_第一课时(特等奖)(沪教版高二下册)_T274713
- 【部编】人教版语文七年级下册《逢入京使》优质课教学视频+PPT课件+教案,安徽省
- 冀教版小学数学二年级下册第二单元《租船问题》
- 沪教版八年级下册数学练习册21.3(3)分式方程P17
- 沪教版牛津小学英语(深圳用) 四年级下册 Unit 2
- 外研版英语七年级下册module1unit3名词性物主代词讲解
- 外研版英语三起5年级下册(14版)Module3 Unit1
精品推荐
- 2016-2017学年高一语文人教版必修一+模块学业水平检测试题(含答案)
- 广西钦州市高新区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高一上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 浙江省湖州市2016-2017学年高二上学期期中考试政治试卷
- 辽宁省铁岭市协作体2017届高三上学期第三次联考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2017届高三11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市钦州港区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高二11月月考政治试卷
- 广西钦州市高新区2016-2017学年高一11月月考政治试卷
分类导航
- 互联网
- 电脑基础知识
- 计算机软件及应用
- 计算机硬件及网络
- 计算机应用/办公自动化
- .NET
- 数据结构与算法
- Java
- SEO
- C/C++资料
- linux/Unix相关
- 手机开发
- UML理论/建模
- 并行计算/云计算
- 嵌入式开发
- windows相关
- 软件工程
- 管理信息系统
- 开发文档
- 图形图像
- 网络与通信
- 网络信息安全
- 电子支付
- Labview
- matlab
- 网络资源
- Python
- Delphi/Perl
- 评测
- Flash/Flex
- CSS/Script
- 计算机原理
- PHP资料
- 数据挖掘与模式识别
- Web服务
- 数据库
- Visual Basic
- 电子商务
- 服务器
- 搜索引擎优化
- 存储
- 架构
- 行业软件
- 人工智能
- 计算机辅助设计
- 多媒体
- 软件测试
- 计算机硬件与维护
- 网站策划/UE
- 网页设计/UI
- 网吧管理